Environmental Footprint and Economics of a Full-Scale 3D-Printed House
| Autor: | Hadeer Abdalla, Kazi Parvez Fattah, Mohamed Abdallah, Adil K. Tamimi |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Ecological footprint
Environmental effects of industries and plants Renewable Energy Sustainability and the Environment Geography Planning and Development Structural system Full scale TJ807-830 Energy consumption Management Monitoring Policy and Law Eco-efficiency Environmental economics Raw material sustainable construction TD194-195 life cycle costing Renewable energy sources Environmental sciences life cycle assessment Capital cost Environmental science concrete GE1-350 Life-cycle assessment additive manufacturing |
| Zdroj: | Sustainability Volume 13 Issue 21 Sustainability, Vol 13, Iss 11978, p 11978 (2021) |
| ISSN: | 2071-1050 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/su132111978 |
| Popis: | 3D printing, is a newly adopted technique in the construction sector with the aim to improve the economics and alleviate environmental impacts. This study assesses the eco-efficiency of 3D printing compared to conventional construction methods in large-scale structural fabrication. A single-storey 3D-printed house was selected in the United Arab Emirates to conduct the comparative assessment against traditional concrete construction. The life cycle assessment (LCA) framework is utilized to quantify the environmental loads of raw materials extraction and manufacturing, as well as energy consumption during construction and operation phases. The economics of the selected structural systems were investigated through life cycle costing analysis (LCCA), that included mainly the construction costs and energy savings. An eco-efficiency analysis was employed to aggregate the results of the LCA and LCCA into a single framework to aid in decision making by selecting the optimum and most eco-efficient alternative. The findings revealed that houses built using additive manufacturing and 3D printed materials were more environmentally favourable. The conventional construction method had higher impacts when compared to the 3D printing method with global warming potential of 1154.20 and 608.55 kg CO2 eq, non-carcinogenic toxicity 675.10 and 11.9 kg 1,4-DCB, and water consumption 233.35 and 183.95 m3, respectively. The 3D printed house was also found to be an economically viable option, with 78% reduction in the overall capital costs when compared to conventional construction methods. The combined environmental and economic results revealed that the overall process of the 3D-printed house had higher eco efficiency compared to concrete-based construction. The main results of the sensitivity analysis revealed that up to 90% of the environmental impacts in 3D printing mortars can be mitigated with decreasing cement ratios. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|