Evaluation of algorithmic, textual and pictorial forms of representation of standard operating procedures for error reduction in complex systems
| Autor: | Claudius, Hammann, Simon, Hurst, Christoph, Krause, Sebastian, Schmeiser, Anna, Wagner, Anna, Feldhütter |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Safety engineering Complex system evaluation Computer science Complex system Article Plane (Unicode) law.invention Image (mathematics) 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine law Flight research simulator Arithmetic lcsh:Social sciences (General) Representation (mathematics) lcsh:Science (General) Human reliability Work error Multidisciplinary Workload ddc System engineering Standard operating procedures Task (computing) 030104 developmental biology Aerospace engineering Autopilot Introduction form lcsh:H1-99 Evidence based 030217 neurology & neurosurgery lcsh:Q1-390 |
| Zdroj: | Heliyon Heliyon, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp e03291-(2020) |
| Popis: | A new concept has been developed to compare different ways of presenting instructions for action for evaluation procedures. The representation forms algorithm (A), image (I) and text (T) are examined with regard to the number of top events, error frequencies, execution times and subjectively perceived workload. For this purpose, a study was carried out with n = 93 test persons in the research flight, in which the test persons had the task of landing a passenger aircraft using the autopilot with different representation forms. Possible work errors 14 with 11 different steps in the representation. Results of positive work-task landing plane: algorithm 58 % (1.7/14 errors σ = 1.5), text 62 % (1.5/14 errors σ = 1.1), image 93 % (0.8/14 errors σ = 1.1). Safety engineering; Aerospace engineering; System engineering; Standard operating procedures; Work error; Introduction form; Human reliability; Complex system evaluation; Evidence based; Flight research simulator |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|