Comparative Effectiveness Research in Lung Diseases and Sleep Disorders
| Autor: | Andrea J. Apter, David H. Au, Andrea L. Harabin, Daniel S. Lewin, Dennis Drotar, Jerry A. Krishnan, Virginia S. Taggart, Marc Moss, Shelby D. Reed, Noreen M. Clark, Susan Redline, Tracy A. Lieu, Thomas F. Boat, Bruce C. Marshall, Stephen B. Soumerai, Michael Schatz, Harry P. Selker, Alfred F. Connors, Carol J. Blaisdell, B. Taylor Thompson, Antonello Punturieri, Robert Smith |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2011 |
| Předmět: |
Lung Diseases
Sleep Wake Disorders Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine Research design Comparative Effectiveness Research medicine.medical_specialty Pathology Comparative effectiveness research Alternative medicine MEDLINE Observation Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Research Support as Topic Humans Medicine Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Medical education business.industry Clinical study design Community Participation Health Plan Implementation United States Data sharing ComputingMethodologies_PATTERNRECOGNITION Research Design Workforce lipids (amino acids peptides and proteins) Observational study NHLBI Workshop National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (U.S.) business |
| Zdroj: | American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 184:848-856 |
| ISSN: | 1535-4970 1073-449X |
| DOI: | 10.1164/rccm.201104-0634ws |
| Popis: | The Division of Lung Diseases of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) held a workshop to develop recommendations on topics, methodologies, and resources for comparative effectiveness research (CER) that will guide clinical decision making about available treatment options for lung diseases and sleep disorders. A multidisciplinary group of experts with experience in efficacy, effectiveness, implementation, and economic research identified (a) what types of studies the domain of CER in lung diseases and sleep disorders should include, (b) the criteria and process for setting priorities, and (c) current resources for and barriers to CER in lung diseases. Key recommendations were to (1) increase efforts to engage stakeholders in developing CER questions and study designs; (2) invest in further development of databases and other infrastructure, including efficient methods for data sharing; (3) make full use of a broad range of study designs; (4) increase the appropriate use of observational designs and the support of methodologic research; (5) ensure that committees that review CER grant applications include persons with appropriate perspective and expertise; and (6) further develop the workforce for CER by supporting training opportunities that focus on the methodologic and practical skills needed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|