Logical Encoding of Argumentation Frameworks with Higher-order Attacks and Evidential Supports

Autor: Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Claudette Cayrol
Přispěvatelé: Argumentation, Décision, Raisonnement, Incertitude et Apprentissage (IRIT-ADRIA), Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse (IRIT), Université Toulouse 1 Capitole (UT1), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Toulouse 1 Capitole (UT1), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine, IRIT - Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools
International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, World Scientific Publishing, 2020, Special Issue on Selected Papers from the 30th Annual IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI-2018), 29 (03n04), pp.2060003. ⟨10.1142/S0218213020600039⟩
HAL
[Research Report] IRIT/RR--2019--03--FR, IRIT-Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse. 2019
ISSN: 0218-2130
DOI: 10.1142/S0218213020600039⟩
Popis: We propose a logical encoding of argumentation frameworks with higher-order interactions (i.e. attacks/supports whose targets are arguments or other attacks/supports) with an evidential meaning for supports. Our purpose is to separate the logical expression of the meaning of an attack or an evidential support (simple or higher-order) from the logical expression of acceptability semantics. We consider semantics which specify the conditions under which the arguments (resp. the attacks/supports) are considered as accepted, directly on the extended framework, without translating the original framework into a Dung’s argumentation framework. We characterize the output of a given framework in logical terms (namely as particular models of a logical theory). Our proposal applies to the particular case of Dung’s frameworks, enabling to recover standard extensions.
Databáze: OpenAIRE