Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions

Autor: T.C Hender, J.C Wesley, J Bialek, A Bondeson, A.H Boozer, R.J Buttery, A Garofalo, T.P Goodman, R.S Granetz, Y Gribov, O Gruber, M Gryaznevich, G Giruzzi, S Günter, N Hayashi, P Helander, C.C Hegna, D.F Howell, D.A Humphreys, G.T.A Huysmans, A.W Hyatt, A Isayama, S.C Jardin, Y Kawano, A Kellman, C Kessel, H.R Koslowski, R.J. La Haye, E Lazzaro, Y.Q Liu, V Lukash, J Manickam, S Medvedev, V Mertens, S.V Mirnov, Y Nakamura, G Navratil, M Okabayashi, T Ozeki, R Paccagnella, G Pautasso, F Porcelli, V.D Pustovitov, V Riccardo, M Sato, O Sauter, M.J Schaffer, M Shimada, P Sonato, E.J Strait, M Sugihara, M Takechi, A.D Turnbull, E Westerhof, D.G Whyte, R Yoshino, H Zohm, the ITPA MHD, Disruption and Magnet Group
Rok vydání: 2007
Předmět:
Zdroj: Nuclear Fusion, 47, S128-S202
Nuclear fusion 47 (2007): S128–S202. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S03
info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Hender T.C.; J.C Wesley; J. Bialek; A. Bondeson; A.H. Boozer;R.J. Buttery; A. Garofalo; T.P Goodman; R.S. Granetz; Y. Gribov; O. Gruber; M. Gryaznevich; G. Giruzzi; S. Günter; N. Hayashi; P. Helander; C.C. Hegna; D.F. Howell; D.A. Humphreys; G.T.A. Huysmans;A.W. Hyatt; A. Isayama; S.C. Jardin; Y. Kawano; A. Kellman; C. Kessel; H.R. Koslowski; R.J. La Haye; E. Lazzaro; Y.Q. Liu; V. Lukash; J. Manickam;S. Medvedev;V. Mertens; S.V. Mirnov; Y. Nakamura; G. Navratil; M. Okabayashi; T. Ozeki; R. Paccagnella; G. Pautasso; F. Porcelli; V.D. Pustovitov;V. Riccardo; M. Sato; O. Sauter; M.J. Schaffer;M. Shimada;P. Sonato;E.J. Strait;M. Sugihara; M. Takechi; A.D. Turnbull; E. Westerhof; D.G. Whyte; R. Yoshino; H. Zohm;/titolo:Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions/doi:10.1088%2F0029-5515%2F47%2F6%2FS03/rivista:Nuclear fusion/anno:2007/pagina_da:S128/pagina_a:S202/intervallo_pagine:S128–S202/volume:47
ISSN: 1741-4326
0029-5515
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/s03
Popis: Progress in the area of MHD stability and disruptions, since the publication of the 1999 ITER Physics Basis document (1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 2137-2664), is reviewed. Recent theoretical and experimental research has made important advances in both understanding and control of MHD stability in tokamak plasmas. Sawteeth are anticipated in the ITER baseline ELMy H-mode scenario, but the tools exist to avoid or control them through localized current drive or fast ion generation. Active control of other MHD instabilities will most likely be also required in ITER. Extrapolation from existing experiments indicates that stabilization of neoclassical tearing modes by highly localized feedback-controlled current drive should be possible in ITER. Resistive wall modes are a key issue for advanced scenarios, but again, existing experiments indicate that these modes can be stabilized by a combination of plasma rotation and direct feedback control with non-axisymmetric coils. Reduction of error fields is a requirement for avoiding non-rotating magnetic island formation and for maintaining plasma rotation to help stabilize resistive wall modes. Recent experiments have shown the feasibility of reducing error fields to an acceptable level by means of non-axisymmetric coils, possibly controlled by feedback. The MHD stability limits associated with advanced scenarios are becoming well understood theoretically, and can be extended by tailoring of the pressure and current density profiles as well as by other techniques mentioned here. There have been significant advances also in the control of disruptions, most notably by injection of massive quantities of gas, leading to reduced halo current fractions and a larger fraction of the total thermal and magnetic energy dissipated by radiation. These advances in disruption control are supported by the development of means to predict impending disruption, most notably using neural networks. In addition to these advances in means to control or ameliorate the consequences of MHD instabilities, there has been significant progress in improving physics understanding and modelling. This progress has been in areas including the mechanisms governing NTM growth and seeding, in understanding the damping controlling RWM stability and in modelling RWM feedback schemes. For disruptions there has been continued progress on the instability mechanisms that underlie various classes of disruption, on the detailed modelling of halo currents and forces and in refining predictions of quench rates and disruption power loads. Overall the studies reviewed in this chapter demonstrate that MHD instabilities can be controlled, avoided or ameliorated to the extent that they should not compromise ITER operation, though they will necessarily impose a range of constraints.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: