Follow the money: Investigating gender disparity in industry payments among senior academics and leaders in plastic surgery
Autor: | Shealinna Ge, Wilmina N. Landford, Yvonne M. Rasko, Brooks J. Knighton, Sheri Slezak, Ledibabari M. Ngaage, Chelsea A. Harris, Talia Stewart, Ronald P. Silverman |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
Economics Health Care Providers Social Sciences 030230 surgery Chi Square Tests 0302 clinical medicine Mathematical and Statistical Techniques Medicine and Health Sciences Medical Personnel Payment Follow the money health care economics and organizations media_common Multidisciplinary Careers Statistics Commerce Research Assessment Plastic surgery Professions 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Cohort Physical Sciences Liberian dollar Medicine Female Psychology Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Techniques Research Article Employment Gender Equity medicine.medical_specialty Science media_common.quotation_subject education MEDLINE Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures Research and Analysis Methods 03 medical and health sciences Health Economics Physicians medicine Humans Industry Statistical Methods Surgery Plastic Statistical Hypothesis Testing Surgeons Conflict of Interest Odds ratio Assistant professor United States Health Care Leadership Bibliometrics Family medicine Labor Economics People and Places Population Groupings Mathematics |
Zdroj: | PLoS ONE PLoS ONE, Vol 15, Iss 12, p e0235058 (2020) |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Popis: | Introduction Differences in academic qualifications are cited as the reason behind the documented gender gap in industry sponsorship to academic plastic surgeons. Gendered imbalances in academic metrics narrow among senior academic plastic surgeons. However, it is unknown whether this gender parity translates to industry payments. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of industry payments disbursed to plastic surgeons in 2018. Inclusion criteria encompassed (i) faculty with the rank of professor or a departmental leadership position. Exclusion criteria included faculty (i) who belonged to a speciality besides plastic surgery; (ii) whose gender could not be determined; or (iii) whose name could not be located on the Open Payment Database. Faculty and title were identified using departmental listings of ACGME plastic surgery residency programs. We extracted industry payment data through the Open Payment Database. We also collected details on H-index and time in practice. Statistical analysis included odds ratios (OR) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R). Results We identified 316 senior academic plastic surgeons. The cohort was predominately male (88%) and 91% held a leadership role. Among departmental leaders, women were more likely to be an assistant professor (OR 3.9, p = 0.0003) and heads of subdivision (OR 2.1, p = 0.0382) than men. Industry payments were distributed equally to male and female senior plastic surgeons except for speakerships where women received smaller amounts compared to their male counterparts (median payments of $3,675 vs $7,134 for women and men respectively, p<0.0001). Career length and H-index were positively associated with dollar value of total industry payments (R = 0.17, p = 0.0291, and R = 0.14, p = 0.0405, respectively). Conclusion Disparity in industry funding narrows at senior levels in academic plastic surgery. At higher academic levels, industry sponsorship may preferentially fund individuals based on academic productivity and career length. Increased transparency in selection criteria for speakerships is warranted. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |