A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke
Autor: | Wilson Low, Kok Soon Phua, Cuntai Guan, Zheng Yang Chin, Chuanchu Wang, Karen Sui Geok Chua, Kai Keng Ang, Christopher Wee Keong Kuah |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2014 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Imagery Psychotherapy medicine.medical_treatment Electroencephalography law.invention Upper Extremity Motor imagery Physical medicine and rehabilitation Randomized controlled trial law medicine Humans Adverse effect Stroke Physical Therapy Modalities Aged Brain–computer interface Rehabilitation medicine.diagnostic_test Stroke Rehabilitation Recovery of Function Robotics General Medicine Middle Aged medicine.disease Treatment Outcome Hemiparesis Neurology Brain-Computer Interfaces Physical therapy Female Neurology (clinical) medicine.symptom Psychology |
Zdroj: | Clinical EEG and Neuroscience. 46:310-320 |
ISSN: | 2169-5202 1550-0594 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1550059414522229 |
Popis: | Electroencephalography (EEG)–based motor imagery (MI) brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has the potential to restore motor function by inducing activity-dependent brain plasticity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an EEG-based MI BCI system coupled with MIT-Manus shoulder-elbow robotic feedback (BCI-Manus) for subjects with chronic stroke with upper-limb hemiparesis. In this single-blind, randomized trial, 26 hemiplegic subjects (Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery After Stroke [FMMA] score, 4-40; 16 men; mean age, 51.4 years; mean stroke duration, 297.4 days), prescreened with the ability to use the MI BCI, were randomly allocated to BCI-Manus or Manus therapy, lasting 18 hours over 4 weeks. Efficacy was measured using upper-extremity FMMA scores at weeks 0, 2, 4 and 12. ElEG data from subjects allocated to BCI-Manus were quantified using the revised brain symmetry index (rBSI) and analyzed for correlation with the improvements in FMMA score. Eleven and 15 subjects underwent BCI-Manus and Manus therapy, respectively. One subject in the Manus group dropped out. Mean total FMMA scores at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 12 weeks improved for both groups: 26.3 ± 10.3, 27.4 ± 12.0, 30.8 ± 13.8, and 31.5 ± 13.5 for BCI-Manus and 26.6 ± 18.9, 29.9 ± 20.6, 32.9 ± 21.4, and 33.9 ± 20.2 for Manus, with no intergroup differences ( P = .51). More subjects attained further gains in FMMA scores at week 12 from BCI-Manus (7 of 11 [63.6%]) than Manus (5 of 14 [35.7%]). A negative correlation was found between the rBSI and FMMA score improvement ( P = .044). BCI-Manus therapy was well tolerated and not associated with adverse events. In conclusion, BCI-Manus therapy is effective and safe for arm rehabilitation after severe poststroke hemiparesis. Motor gains were comparable to those attained with intensive robotic therapy (1,040 repetitions/session) despite reduced arm exercise repetitions using EEG-based MI-triggered robotic feedback (136 repetitions/session). The correlation of rBSI with motor improvements suggests that the rBSI can be used as a prognostic measure for BCI-based stroke rehabilitation. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |