Immunoglobulin E-Mediated Anaphylaxis to Sesame
Autor: | Bogomil Voykov, Vanyo Mitev, Silvia Novakova, Emmanuella Guenova, Sonya Genova |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2008 |
Předmět: |
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Allergy medicine.medical_specialty food.ingredient biology business.industry Immunology Poppy seed medicine.disease Immunoglobulin E biology.organism_classification Dermatology food Food allergy medicine biology.protein Immunology and Allergy Ingestion Sesamum business Letter to the Editor Anaphylaxis Type I hypersensitivity |
Zdroj: | The World Allergy Organization Journal The World Allergy Organization journal, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 134 |
ISSN: | 1939-4551 |
Popis: | To the Editor: The incidence of food allergy is age dependent, particularly affecting children and young patients. When selfreported, it ranges between 3% and 35%. However, placebocontrolled food challenge is positive in just 1% to 4% of all suspected cases. In elderly, anaphylactic reactions tend to be less severe, and a primary manifestation at this age is unusual. A 70-year-old white man needed twice in the past 6 months emergency medical help because of acute systemic anaphylactic reactions, both timely associated with sesame (Sesamum indicum) ingestion. Fifteen minutes after consumption of sesame-poppy-raisin sweets or sesame bread, the patient developed generalized urticaria with periorbital, periocular, and laryngeal edema associated with severe hypotension and unconsciousness. In both cases, emergency treatment with intramuscular administration of epinephrine and high doses of corticosteroids and antihistamines intravenously was needed. Previous allergic reactions were denied. Occasional contact to sesame throughout the life span and noncontributory further own and familial anamnesis were stated. Skin prick tests to common inhalant allergens, housedust mite, preservatives, and food allergens were negative. Furthermore, prick-to-prick tests with poppy seed, raisins, and wheat flour remained negative as well. Surprisingly, skin prick-to-prick tests, both with sesame seed and sesame oil, revealed a pronounced positive reaction compared with the standard histamine control and the control reaction of a healthy volunteer. The specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) for sesame was highly positive (6.37 kUA/L, Phadia ImmunoCAP), whereas total serum IgE (93.5 kUA/L) and basal serum tryptase level (3.1 Hg/L) remained in the normal range. Complying with the patient’s wish to avoid unnecessary diet restriction, we conducted a double-blind placebocontrolled food challenge starting with 25 mg of sesame seeds in bread porridge. Fifteen minutes after a dose of 100 mg of backed sesame seed, acute disseminated urticaria, pruritus, and periorbital and periocular edema occurred without reaction of the upper or lower airways. The IgE-mediated mast cell activation was proven by increased serum tryptase level (17.5 Hg/L) 2 hours after the food challengeYinduced anaphylaxis. The increased reporting of allergic type I hypersensitivity to sesame (S. indicum) with major allergens Ses i 1-7 suggests its growing importance. Several recent reports from Pajno et al and Eberlein-Konig et al describe nonYIgE-mediated sesame anaphylaxis. Our case of classic IgE-mediated anaphylaxis to sesame with primary manifestation in a 70-yearold patient represents the potential life-threatening severity of food anaphylaxis, especially to foods with pronounced allergenic properties such as sesame, irrespective of the patient’s age. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |