Clinical factors associated with augmentation treatment with second-generation antipsychotics and lithium in major depression – Results from a European multicenter study

Autor: Alessandro Serretti, Julien Mendlewicz, Joseph Zohar, Stuart Montgomery, Alexander Kautzky, Siegfried Kasper, Daniel Souery, Stefano Porcelli, Lucie Bartova, Markus Dold
Přispěvatelé: Dold, Marku, Bartova, Lucie, Kautzky, Alexander, Serretti, Alessandro, Porcelli, Stefano, Souery, Daniel, Mendlewicz, Julien, Montgomery, Stuart, Zohar, Joseph, Kasper, Siegfried
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Male
Treatment response
medicine.medical_specialty
Lithium (medication)
Antidepressant
Major depressive disorder
Augmentation
Lithium
Logistic regression
Depressive Disorder
Treatment-Resistant

03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Pharmacotherapy
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
Pharmacology (medical)
Biological Psychiatry
Depressive symptoms
Depression (differential diagnoses)
Retrospective Studies
Pharmacology
Depressive Disorder
Major

business.industry
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Antidepressive Agents
030227 psychiatry
Europe
Psychiatry and Mental health
Cross-Sectional Studies
Treatment Outcome
Second-generation antipsychotic
Neurology
Multicenter study
Lithium Compounds
Drug Therapy
Combination

Female
Neurology (clinical)
business
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Antipsychotic Agents
medicine.drug
Zdroj: European Neuropsychopharmacology. 28:1305-1313
ISSN: 0924-977X
Popis: This cross-sectional European multicenter study with retrospective assessment of treatment response sought to determine variables associated with the administration of augmentation strategies with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and lithium in the pharmacotherapy of major depressive disorder (MDD). In 349 DSM-IV-TR MDD patients, differences in socio-demographic, clinical, treatment, and pharmacological features between participants receiving add-on treatment of their antidepressants with either SGAs (n = 318) or lithium (n = 31) were investigated using analyses of covariance, chi-squared tests, and binary logistic regression analyses. As only significant between-group difference, we found SGA augmentation (compared with lithium augmentation) to be associated with high depressive symptom severity expressed by a higher mean Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating (MADRS) total score (27.19 ± 11.35 vs 18.87 ± 12.88, F = 14.82, p = .0001) and a higher mean 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score (21.27 ± 9.30 vs 13.74 ± 9.11, F = 18.60, p = .0001). No significant differences for socio-demographic features, psychotic symptoms, suicidality, psychiatric and somatic comorbidities, antidepressant pharmacotherapy, and other add-on medications could be seen. Even if there was no significant superiority of one augmentation strategy with regard to treatment response pattern, a trend whereupon adjunctive SGAs were more likely dispensed in treatment-resistant and difficult-to-treat MDD conditions could be observed. In terms of the prescription pattern, we could demonstrate that lithium is less frequently used than SGAs in the clinical routine care which may reflect the need of continuous plasma level determinations and the anticipation of adverse effects.
Databáze: OpenAIRE