Five Methods of Breast Volume Measurement: A Comparative Study of Measurements of Specimen Volume in 30 Mastectomy Cases
| Autor: | Murat Cobanoglu, Mustafa Emiroglu, Serdar Civelek, Osman Gungor, Ragıp Kayar, Hidayet Çatal |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2011 |
| Předmět: |
Cancer Research
medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry medicine.medical_treatment oncoplastic surgery lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens lcsh:RC254-282 mammography-negativity Oncoplastic Surgery Oncology Specimen volume reduction mammaplasty Medicine Mammography Breast volume macromastia business Nuclear medicine Total Mastectomy breast density Mastectomy Patient comfort Volume (compression) Biomedical engineering Original Research |
| Zdroj: | Breast Cancer : Basic and Clinical Research Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research, Vol 5 (2011) Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research, Vol 2011, Iss 5, Pp 43-52 (2011) |
| ISSN: | 1178-2234 |
| Popis: | Background To compare breast volume measurement techniques in terms of accuracy, convenience, and cost. Methods Breast volumes of 30 patients who were scheduled to undergo total mastectomy surgery were measured preoperatively by using five different methods (mammography, anatomic [anthropometric], thermoplastic casting, the Archimedes procedure, and the Grossman-Roudner device). Specimen volume after total mastectomy was measured in each patient with the water displacement method (Archimedes). The results were compared statistically with the values obtained by the five different methods. Results The mean mastectomy specimen volume was 623.5 (range 150–1490) mL. The breast volume values were established to be 615.7 mL (r = 0.997) with the mammographic method, 645.4 mL (r = 0.975) with the anthropometric method, 565.8 mL (r = 0.934) with the Grossman-Roudner device, 583.2 mL (r = 0.989) with the Archimedes procedure, and 544.7 mL (r = 0.94) with the casting technique. Examination of r values revealed that the most accurate method was mammography for all volume ranges, followed by the Archimedes method. Conclusion The present study demonstrated that the most accurate method of breast volume measurement is mammography, followed by the Archimedes method. However, when patient comfort, ease of application, and cost were taken into consideration, the Grossman-Roudner device and anatomic measurement were relatively less expensive, and easier methods with an acceptable degree of accuracy. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|