Robotic-assisted vs conventional surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study
Autor: | Maximiliano Barahona, Nicolas Jabes, Jaime Duboy, Nicolás O. Reyes, Gonzalo Ferrer, Roberto Negrín, Magaly Iñiguez, Carlos Infante |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
musculoskeletal diseases
medicine.medical_specialty Unicompartmental knee medicine.medical_treatment 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine lcsh:Orthopedic surgery Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Robotic-assisted surgery 030222 orthopedics business.industry Soft tissue 030229 sport sciences Sagittal plane Surgery lcsh:RD701-811 Exact test medicine.anatomical_structure Radiological weapon Orthopedic surgery business Oxford knee score Cohort study Research Article |
Zdroj: | Knee Surgery & Related Research Knee Surgery & Related Research, Vol 33, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021) |
ISSN: | 2234-2451 2234-0726 |
Popis: | Background The use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased and new technologies have been developed to improve patient survival and satisfaction, soft tissue balance, alignment, and component size. Robot-assisted systems offer an increase in surgical precision and accuracy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the precision of component position using five radiological parameters in conventional and robotic-assisted medial UKA using the NAVIO system. Methods A cohort study was designed for patients who underwent medial UKA between April 2017 and March 2019 in a single center. Patients were allocated in the conventional (UKA-C) or robotic-assisted (UKA-R) group. The variables analyzed were age, gender, affected knee side, length of hospital stay, surgical time, and radiological measurements such as anatomical medial distal femoral angle (aMDFA), anatomical medial proximal tibial angle (aMPTA), tibial slope, the sagittal femoral angle, and the component size. A target was defined for each measurement, and a successful UKA was defined if at least four radiological measures were on target after surgery. Also, patients’ reported outcomes were evaluated using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and a numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain. Results Thirty-four patients were included, 18 of them underwent UKA-R. The success rate for UKA in the UKA-R group was 87%; meanwhile, in the UKA-C group this was 28%, this difference was significant and powered (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.001; 1 − β = 0.95). Also, a 5-point difference in favor of the UKA-R group in the median OKS (p = 0.01), and a significantly lower median NRS for pain (p Conclusions UKA-R achieved more precision in the radiological parameters’ measure in this study. Also, UKA-R has a trend towards a better OKS and a lower NRS for pain at short-term follow-up. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |