Craniofacial morphology in Apert syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor: | Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Ahmed Ali Alfawzan, Kumar Chandan Srivastava, Deepti Shrivastava, Kiran Kumar Ganji, Srinivas Munisekhar Manay |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2022 |
Předmět: |
Research Report
Craniofacial orthodontics Down syndrome Cephalometry Population lcsh:Medicine Orthodontics Article 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Craniofacial lcsh:Science education Skull Base education.field_of_study Multidisciplinary business.industry lcsh:R 030206 dentistry Acrocephalosyndactylia Prognosis Control subjects medicine.disease Sagittal plane Cleft Palate medicine.anatomical_structure Dentistry Face Meta-analysis Maxilla Posterior cranial base lcsh:Q Down Syndrome business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
Zdroj: | Scientific Reports Scientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2020) |
ISSN: | 2045-2322 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-022-09764-y |
Popis: | This meta-analysis aims to compare Apert syndrome (AS) patients with non-AS populations (not clinically or genetically diagnosed) on craniofacial cephalometric characteristics (CCC) to combine publicly available scientific information while also improving the validity of primary study findings. A comprehensive search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science, an article published between 1st January 2000 to October 17th, 2021. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to carry out this systematic review. We used the PECO system to classify people with AS based on whether or not they had distinctive CCC compared to the non-AS population. Following are some examples of how PECO has been used: People with AS are labeled P; clinical or genetic diagnosis of AS is labeled E; individuals without AS are labeled C; CCC of AS are labeled O. Using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality-Assessment-Scale, independent reviewers assessed the articles' methodological quality and extracted data. 13 studies were included in the systematic review. 8 out of 13 studies were score 7–8 in NOS scale, which indicated that most of the studies were medium to high qualities. Six case–control studies were analyzed for meta-analysis. Due to the wide range of variability in CCC, we were only able to include data from at least three previous studies. There was a statistically significant difference in N-S-PP (I2: 76.56%; P = 0.014; CI 1.27 to − 0.28) and Greater wing angle (I2: 79.07%; P = 0.008; CI 3.07–1.17) between AS and control subjects. Cleft palate, anterior open bite, crowding in the upper jaw, and hypodontia occurred more frequently among AS patients. Significant shortening of the mandibular width, height and length is the most reported feature in AS patients. CT scans can help patients with AS decide whether to pursue orthodontic treatment alone or to have their mouth surgically expanded. The role of well-informed orthodontic and maxillofacial practitioners is critical in preventing and rehabilitating oral health issues. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |