Reducing the risk of foaming and decreasing viscosity by two-stage anaerobic digestion of sugar beet pressed pulp
Autor: | Christian Schwarz, Stefan Pohn, Boris Forsthuber, Günther Bochmann, Elitza Stoyanova, Werner Fuchs |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2013 |
Předmět: |
Environmental Engineering
Hydraulic retention time Continuous stirred-tank reactor Bioengineering Microbiology Industrial Microbiology Bioreactors Biogas Bioenergy Environmental Chemistry Anaerobiosis Waste Products Bacteria Waste management Viscosity Chemistry Pulp and paper industry Pollution Anaerobic digestion Biodegradation Environmental Biofuel Biofuels Fermentation Digestate Digestion Beta vulgaris |
Zdroj: | Biodegradation. 25:277-289 |
ISSN: | 1572-9729 0923-9820 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10532-013-9659-9 |
Popis: | Anaerobic digestion (AD) of sugar beet pressed pulp (SBPP) is a promising treatment concept. It produces biogas as a renewable energy source making sugar production more energy efficient and it turns SBPP from a residue into a valuable resource. In this study one- and two-stage mono fermentation at mesophilic conditions in a continuous stirred tank reactor were compared. Also the optimal incubation temperature for the pre-acidification stage was studied. The fastest pre-acidification, with a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 4 days, occurred at a temperature of 55 °C. In the methanogenic reactor of the two-stage system stable fermentation at loading rate of 7 kg VS/m³ d was demonstrated. No artificial pH adjustment was necessary to maintain optimum levels in both the pre-acidification and the methanogenic reactor. The total HRT of the two-stage AD was 36 days which is considerably lower compared to the one-stage AD (50 days). The frequently observed problem of foaming at high loading rates was less severe in the two-stage reactor. Moreover the viscosity of digestate in the methanogenic stage of the two-stage fermentation was in average tenfold lower than in the one-stage fermentation. This decreases the energy input for the reactor stirring about 80 %. The observed advantages make the two-stage process economically attractive, despite higher investments for a two reactor system. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |