Feasibility of generic, short, and easy-to-use assessment of psychological distress during psychotherapy: Longitudinal measurement invariance of CORE-10 and -OM
Autor: | Tom H. Rosenström, Sanna Mylläri, Veera Malkki, Suoma E. Saarni |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Faculty Common Matters (Faculty of Medicine), Department of Psychology and Logopedics, HUS Psychiatry, Children's Hospital |
Rok vydání: | 2022 |
Předmět: |
psychometrics
CLINICAL-OUTCOMES FIT INDEXES 515 Psychology Mental Disorders OUTCOME MEASURE MODELS Psychotherapy registry ROUTINE EVALUATION Reproducibility of Results PSYCHOPATHOLOGY FACTOR psychosocial intervention Psychotherapy NUMBER Core outcome routine evaluation Clinical Psychology Cross-Sectional Studies PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES Surveys and Questionnaires Humans Feasibility Studies |
Zdroj: | Psychotherapy Research. 32:1090-1099 |
ISSN: | 1468-4381 1050-3307 |
Popis: | Objective: While the CORE-10 inventory for Clinical Outcome Routine Evaluation has shown good psychometric properties in cross-sectional assessment, the feasibility of generic, short, and easy-to-use longitudinal assessment of a broadband construct such as the targeted "general psychological distress" remains to be psychometrically demonstrated. Therefore, we investigated longitudinal measurement invariance (LMI) of CORE-10. For comprehensiveness, we also analyzed its parent inventory, CORE-OM. Method: We investigated the LMI of pre- and post-therapy CORE-10 and -OM assessments in a naturalistic treatment register of 1715 patients' short psychotherapies, testing whether the construct of "psychological distress" remained the same across the treatments. Results: We observed good psychometric properties and no violations of LMI for CORE-10 in chi-squared equivalence tests, nor in effect-size-based evaluations. Only the highly sensitive chi-squared difference tests detected LMI violations but these had little practical influence. The CORE-OM data did not fit well with factorial models but this was cross-sectional rather than a genuinely longitudinal (LMI-related) issue. Conclusions: CORE-10 appeared a structurally valid measure of general psychological distress and suitable for longitudinal assessment, whereas the CORE-OM had a less clear factorial structure. Regarding psychometrics, these findings support the use of CORE-10 in longitudinal assessment during psychotherapy and do not support CORE-OM. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |