The survival rate of transcrestal sinus floor elevation combined with short implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Autor: | Xi Ding, Yan-Qing Jiao, Ge-Ge Wang, Zhang-Yan Ye, Zhe-Zhen Lin |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Sinus Floor Augmentation
Dental implant Dentistry Ocean Engineering Review Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology Cochrane Library Cohort Studies 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Survival rate business.industry RK1-715 030206 dentistry Odds ratio Maxillary Sinus Confidence interval Short implant Survival Rate Observational Studies as Topic Meta-analysis Cross-Sectional Studies Implant business Sinus floor augmentation |
Zdroj: | International Journal of Implant Dentistry, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) International Journal of Implant Dentistry |
ISSN: | 2198-4034 |
Popis: | BackgroundCurrently, insufficient bone volume always occurs in the posterior maxilla which makes implantation difficult. Short implants combined with transcrestal sinus floor elevation (TSFE) may be an option to address insufficient bone volume.PurposeThe clinical performance of short implants combined with TSFE was compared with that of conventional implants combined with TSFE according to the survival rate.MethodIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we followed the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Articles were identified through PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and manual searching. Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies. The quality assessment was performed according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. The odds ratio (OR) with its confidence interval (CI) was considered the essential outcome for estimating the effect of short implants combined with TSFE.ResultsThe registration number is INPLASY202050092. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, including 1 cohort study and 10 cross-sectional studies. With respect to the 1-year survival rate, no significant effect was observed between short implants (length ≤ 8 mm) and conventional implants combined with TSFE (I2=0%, OR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.55-1.96). Similarly, no difference was seen between the two groups regarding the survival rate during the healing period (I2=10%, OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.28-1.97) and 3-year loading (OR=1.76, 95% CI: 0.65-4.74).ConclusionThere was no evidence that the survival rate of short implants combined with TSFE was lower or higher than that of conventional implants combined with TSFE when the residual bone height was poor and the implant protrusion length of short implants was less than or similar to conventional implants. Nevertheless, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the lack of random controlled trials in our meta-analysis. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |