What factors increase the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds?
Autor: | Çağan H. Şekercioğlu, Thomas Evans, David W. Redding, Chunlong Liu, Jonathan M. Jeschke, Tim M. Blackburn |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Şekercioğlu, Çağan Hakkı (ORCID 0000-0003-3193-0377 & YÖK ID 327589), Evans, Thomas, Jeschke, Jonathan M., Liu, Chunlong, Redding, David W., Blackburn, Tim M., College of Sciences, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
0106 biological sciences
woodpeckers Range (biology) media_common.quotation_subject Alien species EICAT Ornithology Seabirds Shorebirds Woodpeckers Vulnerability Biodiversity alien species shorebirds Alien 010603 evolutionary biology 01 natural sciences Competition (biology) Predation ornithology Biodiversity conservation Ecology Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematics media_common 010604 marine biology & hydrobiology 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften Biologie Geography Habitat seabirds |
Zdroj: | Ecography |
ISSN: | 1600-0587 0906-7590 |
Popis: | Biodiversity impacts caused by alien species can be severe, including those caused by alien birds. In order to protect native birds, we aimed to identify factors that influence their vulnerability to the impacts of alien birds. We first reviewed the literature to identify native bird species sustaining such impacts. We then assigned impact severity scores to each native bird species, depending on the severity of the impacts sustained, and performed two types of analyses. First, we used contingency table tests to examine the distribution of impacts across their severity, type and location, and across native bird orders. Second, we used mixed-effects models to test factors hypothesised to influence the vulnerability of native birds to the impacts of alien birds. Ground-nesting shorebirds and seabirds were more prone to impacts through predation, while cavity-nesting woodpeckers and parrots were more prone to impacts through competition. Native bird species were more vulnerable when they occupied islands, warm regions, regions with climatic conditions similar to those in the native range of the invading alien species, and when they were physically smaller than the invading alien species. To a lesser extent, they were also vulnerable when they shared habitat preferences with the invading alien species. By considering the number and type of native bird species affected by alien birds, we demonstrate predation impacts to be more widespread than previously indicated, but also that damaging predation impacts may be underreported. We identify vulnerable orders of native birds, which may require conservation interventions; characteristics of native birds that increase their vulnerability, which may be used to inform risk assessments; and regions where native birds are most vulnerable, which may direct management interventions. The impacts sustained by native birds may be going unnoticed in many regions of the world: there is a clear need to identify and manage them. Belmont Forum -BiodivERsA Joint Project InvasiBES; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF; Alexander von Humboldt Foundation; Freshwater Science International IGB Fellowship Program; Projekt DEAL |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |