A comparative analysis of saphenous vein conduit harvesting techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting--standard bridging versus the open technique
Autor: | James E. Fildes, Nizar Yonan, Osman Najam, Ursalan A. Khan, Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy, Paul D. Waterworth |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2009 |
Předmět: |
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Male medicine.medical_specialty Randomization Pain law.invention Coronary artery bypass surgery Cicatrix Patient satisfaction Randomized controlled trial law medicine Humans Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Saphenous Vein Coronary Artery Bypass Vein Aged Pain Measurement Wound Healing business.industry Great saphenous vein Peripheral Nervous System Diseases Middle Aged Lower limb pain Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Treatment Outcome Patient Satisfaction Anesthesia Tissue and Organ Harvesting Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business Artery |
Zdroj: | Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 10(1) |
ISSN: | 1569-9285 |
Popis: | Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery involves harvesting the great saphenous vein (GSV) using the traditional open technique (TOT). This can be associated with significant leg morbidity and patient dissatisfaction. Alternatively, the standard bridging technique (SBT) is a minimally invasive procedure of vein retrieval that uses smaller frequent incisions along the length of the leg and may reduce postoperative complications. This study was designed to compare the success of SBT in reducing leg morbidity and increasing patient satisfaction. One hundred patients were recruited into the study and computer randomised into two groups of 50 undergoing SBT or TOT. Leg morbidity and patient satisfaction were analysed by assessment of pain scores, wound development and scar formation. Closure and harvesting time were also compared between the two groups. SBT was associated with better wound development (P |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |