Institutional Review Board Preparedness for Disaster Research: a Practical Approach
| Autor: | Julia Slutsman, Janet E. Hall, Alice Fothergill, Aubrey Miller, Joan P. Packenham, Steve Ramsey, Richard Rosselli |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Environmental Disasters (D Sandler and A Miller
Section Editors) Preparedness Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis Best practice Vulnerability Management Monitoring Policy and Law Disasters 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Political science Humans Disaster research Environmental impact assessment 030212 general & internal medicine Remedial education Nature and Landscape Conservation Ethics Government 030505 public health business.industry Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health Public relations Institutional review board humanities Institutional Review Board (IRB) Protocol development 0305 other medical science business Ethics Committees Research |
| Zdroj: | Current Environmental Health Reports |
| ISSN: | 2196-5412 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s40572-021-00311-x |
| Popis: | Purpose of ReviewDisasters are becoming more common and challenge national and global resiliency and response efforts. As a result, government agencies have increased interest in disaster research to understand their environmental impact and health-related consequences. With the research field greatly expanding, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are being asked to review research protocols aimed at assessing health risks, exposures, and outcomes from disaster survivors. Few IRBs have experience reviewing disaster research protocols. This article describes approaches for IRB preparedness in reviewing disaster research.Recent FindingsFrom a human research protections perspective, primary attention has focused on vulnerability of individuals and/or populations affected by a disaster who may serve as research participants [3, 4]. From our review of the current literature, there is a lack of best practices and/or guidance for IRBs in the review of disaster research protocols.SummaryThe growth of the disaster research field has brought more attention to potential ethical concerns of disaster research studies. Disaster survivors, responders, and those that assist in cleanup and remedial efforts may be left with significant unmet needs and long-term physical and emotional challenges as a result of their experiences. It is important for IRBs and investigators to collaboratively address how best to protect the welfare of individuals and communities affected by a disaster. A new approach is needed to systematically consider the various factors relevant to an assessment of human research protection issues following disasters. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink