Evaluation of oral formulations of gentamicin containing labrasol in beagle dogs
Autor: | Yukako Yoshikawa, Riichi Tawa, Makoto Ishida, Sudarat Eaimtrakarn, Yoichi Kusawake, Kanji Takada, Y.V. Rama Prasad, Nobuhito Shibata |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2003 |
Předmět: |
Chemistry
Pharmaceutical Cmax Pharmaceutical Science Administration Oral Capsules Pharmacology Dosage form Intestinal absorption Glycerides Dogs Drug Delivery Systems Pharmacokinetics Oral administration Animals Organic Chemicals Antibacterial agent Active ingredient Chromatography Chemistry Bioavailability Anti-Bacterial Agents Drug Combinations Intestinal Absorption Area Under Curve Emulsions Gentamicins |
Zdroj: | International journal of pharmaceutics. 268(1-2) |
ISSN: | 0378-5173 |
Popis: | Gentamicin (GM) is a polarized water-soluble compound having very poor intestinal membrane permeability resulting in low oral bioavailability. Labrasol was found to improve the intestinal absorption of GM in rats. In the present study, GM formulations containing labrasol were evaluated in beagle dogs after filling into hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC) capsules wrapped with Eudragit L100 (Eud L) and Eudragit S100 (Eud S) films. The results of the in vitro drug release studies could not differentiate between two kinds of enteric capsules and among the three kinds of GM formulations. Oral administration of GM solution at a dose of 50.0 mg per dog of GM and 0.60 ml per dog of labrasol has resulted in Cmax values of 2.38 +/- 0.50 microg/ml and 2.30 +/- 0.42 microg/ml with Eud L and Eud S capsules, respectively. The AUC values obtained were also higher at 4.35 +/- 1.31 microg h/ml and 5.34 +/- 0.95 microg h/ml with Eud L and Eud S capsules, respectively. Formulation of GM as a suspension in labrasol has resulted in the decrease of Cmax values by two to four times and AUC values by > 2.5 times compared to the solution formulation. The above results indicate that solution formulation was better over the suspension. An absorbent, synthetic sponge was used to absorb GM solution formulation and encapsulated with Eud L and Eud S capsules. The Cmax and AUC values obtained with sponge formulation were higher than those of suspension formulations but were lower than solution formulations. There was no significant difference in the extent of GM absorption between Eud L and Eud S capsules used for encapsulating GM formulations. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |