WISC-IV GAI and CPI profiles in healthy children and children with learning disabilities
Autor: | Thierry Lecerf, Sophie Geistlich, E. Peiffer, F. Bovet-Boone, Sotta Kieng |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
GAI
05 social sciences 050301 education Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 050109 social psychology Cognition Assessment Base rate Developmental psychology ddc:150 Perceptual reasoning Learning disability CPI medicine 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Verbal comprehension medicine.symptom Psychology WISC-IV 0503 education Applied Psychology Clinical psychology Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children |
Zdroj: | Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée, Vol. 66, No 3 (2016) pp. 101-107 |
ISSN: | 1162-9088 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.erap.2016.04.001 |
Popis: | Introduction In addition to the FSIQ, the General Ability Index (GAI) and the Cognitive Proficiency Index (CPI) are two ancillary scores that can be calculated for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale. The GAI and the CPI have been proposed to assist in identifying cognitive strengths and weaknesses, and thus to provide different views into individual's cognitive abilities. Objective The purpose of the present study is to provide the frequency of GAI/CPI score difference by direction, the frequency of FSIQ/GAI score difference, and the frequency of FSIQ/CPI score difference, for the French Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children and Adolescents–Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). Method These frequencies are provided for a sample of healthy children ( n = 483), and for a sample of children with learning disabilities (LD, n = 370). The GAI comprises verbal comprehension and perceptual reasoning subtests, while CPI comprises working memory and processing speed subtests. Results Results indicated that the healthy sample performed better than the LD sample for all composite scores. The FSIQ was lower than the GAI for both groups and this difference was slightly larger for the LD sample (−1.35 points vs. −3.22 points). The GAI was higher than the CPI for both samples, but this difference was not significantly larger for the LD sample (4.2 points vs. 6.16 points). Finally, while the FSIQ was higher than the CPI for both groups, this difference was not larger for the LD sample (2.85 points vs. 2.95 points). Conclusion These findings support the use of the GAI and the CPI, in addition to the FSIQ. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |