Mandatory Non-financial Disclosure and Its Influence on CSR: An International Comparison

Autor: Gregory Jackson, Julia Bartosch, Daniel Kinderman, Emma Avetisyan, Jette Steen Knudsen
Přispěvatelé: Audencia Business School
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Business Ethics
Journal of Business Ethics, Springer Verlag, 2020, 162 (2), pp.323-342. ⟨10.1007/s10551-019-04200-0⟩
Journal of Business Ethics, 163, 323-342
ISSN: 0167-4544
1573-0697
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04200-0⟩
Popis: International audience; The article examines the effects of non-financial disclosure (NFD) on corporate social responsibility (CSR). We conceptualise trade-offs between two ideal types (government regulation and business self-regulation) in relation to CSR. Whereas self-regulation is associated with greater flexibility for businesses to develop best practices, it can also lead to complacency if firms feel no external pressure to engage with CSR. In contrast, government regulation is associated with greater stringency around minimum standards, but can also result in rigidity owing to a 'one size fits all' approach. Given these potential trade-offs, we ask how mandatory non-financial disclosure has been shaping CSR practices and examine its potential effectiveness as a regulatory instrument. Our analysis of 24 OECD countries using the Asset4 database shows that firms in countries that require non-financial disclosure adopt significantly more CSR activities. However, we also find that NFD regulation does not lead to lower levels of corporate irresponsibility. Furthermore, our analysis demonstrates that, over time, the variation in CSR activities declines as firms adopt increasingly similar practices. Our study thereby contributes to understanding the impact of government regulation on CSR at firm level. We also discuss the limits of mandatory NFD in addressing regulatory trade-offs between stringency and flexibility in the field of corporate social responsibility.
Databáze: OpenAIRE