Development of Patients’ Decision Aid for Older Women With Stage I Breast Cancer Considering Radiotherapy After Lumpectomy
| Autor: | Hilary A. Llewellyn-Thomas, Laura D'Alimonte, Edmee Franssen, Ewa Szumacher, Jan E. Angus, Kelly A. Metcalfe, Eiran Warner, Timothy J. Whelan, Larry Paszat, Jennifer Wong |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2012 |
| Předmět: |
Cancer Research
medicine.medical_specialty medicine.medical_treatment Breast Neoplasms Pilot Projects Decisional conflict Mastectomy Segmental Choice Behavior Decision Support Techniques Breast cancer Surveys and Questionnaires Humans Medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Aged Aged 80 and over Adjuvant radiotherapy Radiation business.industry Lumpectomy Age Factors medicine.disease Surgery Radiation therapy Distress Receptors Estrogen Oncology Needs assessment Physical therapy Female Pamphlets Radiotherapy Adjuvant Patient Participation business Stage I breast cancer |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 84:30-38 |
| ISSN: | 0360-3016 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.028 |
| Popis: | To develop a patient decision aid (PtDA) for older women with Stage I, pathologically node negative, estrogen receptor-positive progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer who are considering adjuvant radiotherapy after lumpectomy and to examine its impact on patients' decision making.A PtDA was developed and evaluated in three steps according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework: (1) needs assessment (n = 16); (2) Pilot I to examine PtDA acceptability (n = 12); and (3) Pilot II, a pretest posttest (n = 38) with older women with estrogen receptor-positive progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer after lumpectomy who were receiving adjuvant radiation therapy. Measures included patients' satisfaction with the PtDA, self-reported decisional conflict, level of distress, treatment-related knowledge, and choice predisposition.The PtDA is a booklet that details each adjuvant treatment option's benefits, risks, and side effects tailored to the patient's clinical profile; includes a values clarification exercise; and includes steps to guide patients towards their decision. On the basis of qualitative comments and satisfaction ratings, all women thought that the PtDA was helpful and informative. In comparison with their baseline scores, patients had a statistically significant (p0.05) reduction in decisional conflict (adjusted mean difference [AMD], -7.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.50 to 12.59); increased clarity of the benefits and risks (AMD, -10.86; CI, -20.33 to 21.49); and improved general treatment knowledge (AMD, 8.99; CI, 2.88-10.28) after using the PtDA. General trends were also reported in the patients' choice predisposition scores that suggested potential differences in treatment decision after PtDA use.This study provides evidence that this PtDA may be a helpful educational tool for this group of women. The quality of care for older breast cancer patients may be enhanced by the use of a tailored PtDA to help patients be better informed about their treatment options. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|