Joint periviability counseling between neonatology and obstetrics is a rare occurrence
| Autor: | Linda M. Gerber, Rachel Reed, Ericalyn Kasdorf, Tracy Grossman, Gulce Askin |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Counseling
medicine.medical_specialty MEDLINE 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Pregnancy Surveys and Questionnaires 030225 pediatrics Humans Medicine 030212 general & internal medicine Neonatology Child Health policy business.industry Infant Newborn Obstetrics and Gynecology Perinatology United States Obstetrics Family medicine Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health Female business Medical ethics Patient education |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Perinatology. 40:1789-1796 |
| ISSN: | 1476-5543 0743-8346 |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s41372-020-00796-8 |
| Popis: | To investigate the frequency with which neonatal and maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) providers perform joint periviability counseling (JPC), compare content of counseling, and identify perceived barriers to JPC.An anonymous REDCap survey was e-mailed to members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine and to members of the Society for MFM.There were 424 neonatal and 115 MFM participants. Fifty-two percent of neonatal and 35% of MFM respondents reported rarely/never performing JPC (p 0.001), while 80% and 82%, respectively felt it would improve counseling. Content of counseling was similar, except for length of stay with 93% of neonatal vs. 85% of MFM respondents addressing this (p = 0.03). The majority (60%) of respondents in both groups reported that clinical duties posed a significant/great barrier to JPC.JPC is recommended but infrequently performed, with both specialties interested in further collaboration to strengthen the counseling provided. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink