How are formative assessment methods used in the clinical setting? A qualitative study
Autor: | Pernille Andreassen, Bente Malling |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Male
PERCEPTIONS 020205 medical informatics WORKPLACE-BASED ASSESSMENT Attitude of Health Personnel education Context (language use) Resistance (psychoanalysis) 02 engineering and technology Formative assessment Nonprobability sampling Interviews as Topic 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Phone Health care MEDICAL-EDUCATION 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Medical Staff Hospital Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Workplace focused ethnography everyday resistance Anthropology Cultural Qualitative Research Original Research Medical education junior doctors business.industry Formative assessment methods Formative Assessment Methods General Medicine Content analysis postgraduate medical education SKILLS Female Clinical Competence business Psychology Qualitative research |
Zdroj: | International Journal of Medical Education Andreassen, P & Malling, B V G 2019, ' How are formative assessment methods used in the clinical setting? A qualitative study ', International Journal of Medical Education, vol. 10, pp. 208-215 . https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5db3.62e3 |
ISSN: | 2042-6372 |
DOI: | 10.5116/ijme.5db3.62e3 |
Popis: | Objectives: To explore how formative assessment methods are used and perceived by second-year junior doctors in different clinical settings.Methods: A focused ethnography study was carried out. Ten second-year junior doctors from different specialties were selected using purposive sampling. The junior doctors were observed during a day in their clinical workplace where formative assessment was in focus. They were subsequently phone interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide regarding their experiences and attitudes towards formative assessment. Field notes from observations and interview transcriptions were analyzed using an inductive content analysis approach, and the concept of “everyday resistance” was used as a theoretical lens.Results: Three themes were identified: First, there were several barriers to the use of formative assessment methods in the clinical context, including subtle tactics of everyday resistance such as avoidance, deprioritizing, and contesting formative assessment methods. Secondly, junior doctors made careful selections when arranging a formative assessment. Finally, junior doctors had ambiguous attitudes towards the use of mandatory formative assessment methods and mixed experiences with their educational impact.Conclusions: This study emphasizes that the use of formative assessment methods in the clinical setting is not a neutral and context-independent exercise, but rather is affected by a myriad of factors such as collegial relations, educational traditions, emotional issues, and subtle forms of resistance. An important implication for the health care sector will be to address these issues for formative assessment methods to be properly implemented in the clinic. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |