Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: Impact on access, equity, and outcomes
Autor: | Melissa Cheyney, Kathrin Stoll, Timothy J. Fisher, Renee Ann Cramer, Emma Butt, Holly Powell Kennedy, Eugene Declercq, Y. Tony Yang, Saraswathi Vedam, Marian F. MacDorman |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2017 |
Předmět: |
Scope of practice
Nurse Midwives Physiology Maternal Health Breastfeeding lcsh:Medicine Pediatrics Health Services Accessibility Midwives Labor and Delivery 0302 clinical medicine Pregnancy Medicine and Health Sciences Birth Weight 030212 general & internal medicine Medical Personnel lcsh:Science 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine Multidisciplinary Pregnancy Outcome Obstetrics and Gynecology Place of birth Health equity Professions Breast Feeding Physiological Parameters Female medicine.symptom Psychology Research Article Washington Death Rates Birth weight Preterm Birth 03 medical and health sciences Patient safety Population Metrics medicine North Carolina Humans Maternal Health Services Healthcare Disparities Population Biology lcsh:R Body Weight Biology and Life Sciences Neonates United States Pregnancy Complications Low birth weight People and Places Birth Women's Health lcsh:Q Population Groupings Neonatology Breast feeding Demography Developmental Biology |
Zdroj: | PLoS ONE PLoS ONE, Vol 13, Iss 2, p e0192523 (2018) |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Popis: | Poor coordination of care across providers and birth settings has been associated with adverse maternal-newborn outcomes. Research suggests that integration of midwives into regional health systems is a key determinant of optimal maternal-newborn outcomes, yet, to date, the characteristics of an integrated system have not been described, nor linked to health disparities. Methods Our multidisciplinary team examined published regulatory data to inform a 50-state database describing the environment for midwifery practice and interprofessional collaboration. Items (110) detailed differences across jurisdictions in scope of practice, autonomy, governance, and prescriptive authority; as well as restrictions that can affect patient safety, quality, and access to maternity providers across birth settings. A nationwide survey of state regulatory experts (n = 92) verified the ‘on the ground’ relevance, importance, and realities of local interpretation of these state laws. Using a modified Delphi process, we selected 50/110 key items to include in a weighted, composite Midwifery Integration Scoring (MISS) system. Higher scores indicate greater integration of midwives across all settings. We ranked states by MISS scores; and, using reliable indicators in the CDC-Vital Statistics Database, we calculated correlation coefficients between MISS scores and maternal-newborn outcomes by state, as well as state density of midwives and place of birth. We conducted hierarchical linear regression analysis to control for confounding effects of race. Results MISS scores ranged from lowest at 17 (North Carolina) to highest at 61 (Washington), out of 100 points. Higher MISS scores were associated with significantly higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery, vaginal birth after cesarean, and breastfeeding, and significantly lower rates of cesarean, preterm birth, low birth weight infants, and neonatal death. MISS scores also correlated with density of midwives and access to care across birth settings. Significant differences in newborn outcomes accounted for by MISS scores persisted after controlling for proportion of African American births in each state. Conclusion The MISS scoring system assesses the level of integration of midwives and evaluates regional access to high quality maternity care. In the United States, higher MISS Scores were associated with significantly higher rates of physiologic birth, less obstetric interventions, and fewer adverse neonatal outcomes. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |