Strengths and weaknesses of the psychology of criminal conduct: Implications for the conceptualisation, assessment and treatment of antisocial personality pattern
| Autor: | Clare-Ann Fortune, Roxanne Heffernan |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Weakness
Scope (project management) 160299 Criminology not elsewhere classified Concept Formation Applied psychology 170199 Psychology not elsewhere classified FOS: Law Antisocial Personality Disorder Intervention planning FOS: Psychology Psychiatry and Mental health Clinical Psychology Risk Factors Criminal Behavior Criminal Conduct medicine Humans Antisocial personality medicine.symptom Psychology Law Coherence (linguistics) Strengths and weaknesses Criminal justice |
| Zdroj: | Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 39:678-693 |
| ISSN: | 1099-0798 0735-3936 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/bsl.2545 |
| Popis: | The Psychology of Criminal Conduct and its associated components (e.g. the Risk Need Responsivity model, the Central Eight risk factors) has been hugely influential in the criminal justice sector. However, like any theory it has relative strengths and weakness, one weakness being that assumptions have been made about the causal nature and conceptual coherence of its foundational constructs, dynamic risk factors. The numerous issues with the conceptualisation of dynamic risk factors have implications for the widespread practice of using them as explanations of offending and to inform intervention planning. Recently some attention has been given to exploring the conceptualisation and definitions, scope and use of dynamic risk factors. Some key advancements in this area are considered and we illustrate how the weaknesses encountered by dynamic risk factors may impact our understanding and application of these concepts, using the example of Antisocial Personality Pattern. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
| Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |