Observation of High School Students' Food Handling Behaviors: Do They Improve following a Food Safety Education Intervention?
| Autor: | Shannon E. Majowicz, David Hammond, Joel A. Dubin, Scott T. Leatherdale, Kenneth J. Diplock, Andria Jones-Bitton |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Male
0301 basic medicine Health Knowledge Attitudes Practice Education intervention Food Safety Food handlers Adolescent Food Handling Health Behavior education Control (management) Microbiology Food handling 03 medical and health sciences 0404 agricultural biotechnology Intervention (counseling) Humans Students Ontario Medical education 030109 nutrition & dietetics Intervention program business.industry 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences Food safety 040401 food science Female Training program business Psychology Food Science |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Food Protection. 81:917-925 |
| ISSN: | 0362-028X |
| DOI: | 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-17-441 |
| Popis: | Youth are a key audience for food safety education. They often engage in risky food handling behaviors, prepare food for others, and have limited experience and knowledge of safe food handling practices. Our goal was to investigate the effectiveness of an existing food handler training program for improving safe food handling behaviors among high school students in Ontario, Canada. However, because no schools agreed to provide control groups, we evaluated whether behaviors changed following delivery of the intervention program and whether changes were sustained over the school term. We measured 32 food safety behaviors, before the intervention and at 2-week and 3-month follow-up evaluations by in-person observations of students ( n = 119) enrolled in grade 10 and 12 Food and Nutrition classes ( n = 8) and who individually prepared recipes. We examined within-student changes in behaviors across the three time points, using mixed effects regression models to model trends in the total food handling score (of a possible 32 behaviors) and subscores for "clean" (17 behaviors), "separate" (14 behaviors), and "cook" (1 behavior), adjusting for student characteristics. At baseline, students ( n = 108) averaged 49.1% (15.7 of 32 behaviors; standard deviation = 5.8) correct food handling behaviors, and only 5.5% (6) of the 108 students used a food thermometer to check the doneness of the chicken (the "cook" behavior). All four behavior score types increased significantly ∼2 weeks postintervention and remained unchanged ∼3 months later. Student characteristics (e.g., having taken a prior food handling course) were not significant predictors of the total number of correctly performed food handling behaviors or of the "clean" or "separate" behaviors, working or volunteering in a food service establishment was the only characteristic significantly associated with food thermometer use (i.e., "cook"). Despite the significant increase in correct behaviors, students continued to use risky practices postintervention, suggesting that the risk of foodborne disease remained. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|