AGENDAS, PREFERENCES, COMPETITION: PT and PSDB in presidential disputes

Autor: Gabriela da Silva Tarouco, Soraia Marcelino Vieira, Rafael Machado Madeira
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Caderno CRH v.30 n.80 2017
Caderno CRH
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
Caderno CRH, Volume: 30, Issue: 80, Pages: 257-273, Published: MAY 2017
Caderno CRH, Vol 30, Iss 80, Pp 257-273
ISSN: 1983-8239
0103-4979
Popis: Ha um debate na ciencia politica brasileira sobre a bipolarizacao do sistema partidario, decorrente da concentracao da competicao, nas eleicoes presidenciais, em dois partidos: PT e PSDB. O objetivo do artigo e identificar o conteudo e os termos da competicao entre tais partidos no que se refere as suas enfases tematicas, atraves da comparacao entre os programas de governo de cada um para as eleicoes presidenciais de 2006 a 2014. A hipotese, derivada da saliency theory, e de que a competicao entre eles se baseia na selecao de temas especificos e agendas alternativas. O metodo utilizado para mensuracao das agendas e preferencias e a analise de conteudo, com aplicacao das categorias do Manifest Research Group/MARPOR. Os resultados revelam que as plataformas se aproximam por conterem os temas da agenda publica nacional, mas se distinguem nas prioridades que estabelecem e na direcao em que adaptam suas enfases ao longo do tempo. Palavras-Chave: Manifestos; Analise de conteudo; Partidos politicos; Eleicoes presidenciais; Agenda de politicas publicas. AGENDAS, PREFERENCES, COMPETITION: PT and PSDB in presidential disputes ABSTRACT In the Brazilian political science, there is a debate about the bipolarization of the party system resulting from the concentration of the competition in the presidential elections in two parties: PT and PSDB. This article aims to identify the content and the terms of competition among such parties concerning their thematic emphasis by comparing government plans of each party for the presidential elections from 2006 to 2014. The hypothesis, derived from saliency theory, is that the competition between them is based on the selection of specific themes and alternative agendas. The method used to measure agendas and preferences is the content analysis, applying the categories of the Manifest Research Group – MARPOR. The results reveled that platforms come closer to each other due to the inclusion of themes of the national public agenda, but they are distinguished in the priorities that each party establish and in the direction in which they adapt their emphases over time. Key words: Manifests; content analysis; political parties; presidential elections; public policy agenda AGENDAS, PREFERENCES, COMPETITION: PT et PSDB se disputent les presidentielles ABSTRACT Au sein de la science politique bresilienne et en ce qui concerne les elections presidentielles, il existe un debat sur la bipolarisation du systeme des partis resultant d’une concentration de la competition autour de deux partis, le PT et le PSDB. Cet article se veut d’identifier le contenu et les termes de la concurrence entre ces partis en fonction de leurs axes thematiques et de comparer leurs programmes gouvernementaux respectifs lors des elections presidentielles de 2006 a 2014. L’hypothese, derivee de la saliency theory , est que la competition qui s’engage entre eux est basee sur la selection de themes specifiques et de compromis alternatifs. La methode utilisee pour mesurer les compromis et les preferences est l’analyse de contenu a laquelle on applique les categories du Manifest Research Group - MARPOR. Les resultats revelent que les plates-formes se rapprochent par l’inclusion de themes des compromis publics nationaux, mais se distinguent au niveau des priorites etablies et de la direction prise pour adapter leurs efforts au fil du temps. Key words: Manifestes; Analyse de contenu; Partis politiques; Elections presidentielles; Compromis des politiques publiques
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: