Mesh complications on YouTube
Autor: | Gürkan Uncu, Adnan Orhan, Gozde Guner Gokturk, Kiper Aslan, Isil Kasapoglu, Kemal Özerkan |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Pelvic organ business.industry Video Recording Obstetrics and Gynecology Urinary incontinence Negative attitude Surgical Mesh United Kingdom Urogynecology Primary outcome Reproductive Medicine Family medicine medicine Humans Social media medicine.symptom business Social Media |
Zdroj: | European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 252 |
ISSN: | 1872-7654 |
Popis: | Objective There has been a heated discussion about mesh materials in urogynecology in recent years. The role of social media in this discussion is critical. This study aims to make a systematic analysis of videos uploaded to YouTube about mesh complications in urogynecology. Study Design YouTube was searched using specific terms about mesh materials. The primary outcome was the relationship between the video characteristics -which were publisher identity, attitude, the main focus of the video country, and year- and the mesh debate in urogynecology. Results We analyzed 1128 YouTube videos about mesh complications. There was no distinction between stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse when referring to the mesh material in 79 % of the videos. 35.2 % of the videos were in the News group, 31.2 % were in the Patients group, 19.6 % were in the Doctors group, and 14.0 % were in the Lawyers group. Videos in the News (75.7 %), Patients (92.6 %), and Lawyers (99.4 %) groups mostly had a negative attitude, while videos in the Doctors (48.9 %) group mostly had an informative attitude. News (43.2 %) and Patients (51.2 %) group videos were predominantly from the United Kingdom. However, Lawyers (81.0 %) and Doctors (44.3 %) videos were predominantly from the USA. In the last three years, the news and patients videos have increased by an average of 40 % each year. Conclusion YouTube has influenced the mesh dilemma with a negative attitude. As long as social media is at the center of this discussion, a healthy outcome cannot be achieved. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |