A meta-analysis to study the effect of pan retinal photocoagulation on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in diabetic retinopathy patients
Autor: | Manika Manika, Shibal Bhartiya, Ashish Upadhaya, Meenakshi Wadhwani |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Retinal Ganglion Cells
medicine.medical_specialty retinal nerve fiber layer thickness Databases Factual Nerve fiber layer Reviews Panretinal photocoagulation Weighted mean difference chemistry.chemical_compound Nerve Fibers Ophthalmology Medicine Humans Fluorescein Angiography Diabetic Retinopathy Laser Coagulation business.industry Retinal General Medicine Diabetic retinopathy Organ Size medicine.disease panretinal photocoagulation eye diseases medicine.anatomical_structure chemistry Meta-analysis sense organs business Retinal photocoagulation Tomography Optical Coherence |
Zdroj: | Romanian Journal of Ophthalmology |
ISSN: | 2501-2533 |
Popis: | Background. Diabetic retinopathy is a microvascular disease, it is associated with changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, these changes being more pronounced in PDR (Proliferative diabetic retinopathy) patients undergoing laser photocoagulation. Objective. To assess changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients using optical coherence tomogram (OCT). Methods. The database search was conducted in June 2018 and continued until October 2018. The search engines used included Pubmed, Medline, OVID and Google Scholar. A meta-analysis of weighted mean difference and standard deviation was conducted. Results. A total of 10 studies containing 377 eyes of PDR patients were selected. The analysis of the included studies revealed no significant effect of PRP on average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (0.249, 95% CI: -0.985 to 1.483) using OCT. Conclusion. Hence, to conclude, our meta-analysis revealed that there was no significant effect of PRP on RNFL thickness and the impact of PRP could vary. Measurement of peripapillary RNFL thickness may yield erroneous and unpredictable results in this subgroup of patients, further confounding the evaluation of nerve fiber layer damage and its progression. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |