Should We Base Training Prescription on the Force–Velocity Profile? Exploratory Study of Its Between-Day Reliability and Differences Between Methods
| Autor: | Elaia Torrontegi, Guillermo Sánchez-Martínez, Pedro L. Valenzuela, G. Gregory Haff, Zigor Montalvo, Javier Vázquez-Carrión |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Intraclass correlation
Coefficient of variation Posture Reproducibility of Results Physical Therapy Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation Exploratory analysis Base (group theory) Prescriptions Squat jump Statistics Jump Humans Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Muscle Strength Reliability (statistics) Force velocity Mathematics |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 16:1001-1007 |
| ISSN: | 1555-0273 1555-0265 |
| Popis: | Purpose: To analyze the differences in the force–velocity (F–v) profile assessed under unconstrained (ie, using free weights) and constrained (ie, on a Smith machine) vertical jumps, as well as to determine the between-day reliability. Methods: A total of 23 trained participants (18 [1] y) performed an incremental load squat jump test (with ∼35%, 45%, 60%, and 70% of the subjects’ body mass) on 2 different days using free weights and a Smith machine. Nine of these participants repeated the tests on 2 other days for an exploratory analysis of between-day reliability. F–v variables (ie, maximum theoretical force [F0], velocity [v0], and power, and the imbalance between the actual and the theoretically optimal F–v profile) were computed from jump height. Results: A poor agreement was observed between the F–v variables assessed under constrained and unconstrained conditions (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] .70). The F–v variables computed under constrained conditions showed an overall good agreement (ICC = .75–.95 for all variables) and no significant differences between days (P > .05), but a high variability for v0, the imbalance between the actual and the theoretically optimal F–v profile, and maximal theoretical power (coefficient of variation = 17.0%–27.4%). No between-day differences were observed for any F–v variable assessed under unconstrained conditions (P > .05), but all of the variables presented a low between-day reliability (coefficient of variation > 10% and ICC Conclusions: F–v variables differed meaningfully when obtained from constrained and unconstrained loaded jumps, and most importantly seemed to present a low between-day reliability. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|