Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition

Autor: Louk V.A.M. Beex, H. M. Zonderland, Harry J. de Koning, Sybren L. Meijer, Peter E. Besnard, Theo Kok, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Cecile T. M. Brekelmans, Radu A. Manoliu, Madeleine M.A. Tilanus-Linthorst, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Carla Boetes, Hans Peterse, Emiel J. Th. Rutgers, Jan G. M. Klijn, Inge Marie Obdeijn, Sara H. Muller, Mieke Kriege
Přispěvatelé: Medical Oncology, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Surgery, Public Health, Other departments, Pathology, Damage and Repair in Cancer Development and Cancer Treatment (DARE), Targeted Gynaecologic Oncology (TARGON)
Rok vydání: 2004
Předmět:
medicine.medical_treatment
Lobular carcinoma
Breast cancer screening
HISTORY
Mass Screening
Breast MRI
Prospective Studies
Prospective cohort study
skin and connective tissue diseases
Molecular diagnosis
prognosis and monitoring [UMCN 1.2]

medicine.diagnostic_test
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
TRIALS
OOPHORECTOMY
Female
Radiology
Mastectomy
Mammography
Adult
Risk
medicine.medical_specialty
Breast Neoplasms
MUTATION CARRIERS
Sensitivity and Specificity
Breast cancer
SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
SURVEILLANCE
MASTECTOMY
medicine
Humans
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Germ-Line Mutation
Mass screening
Aged
Gynecology
Chi-Square Distribution
BRCA2 MUTATION
business.industry
MORTALITY
medicine.disease
Survival Analysis
HIGH-RISK
ROC Curve
Case-Control Studies
DENSITY
Functional Imaging [UMCN 1.1]
business
Zdroj: The New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 5, pp. 427-37
New England Journal of Medicine, 351(5), 427-437. Massachussetts Medical Society
New England journal of medicine, 351(5), 427-437. Massachussetts Medical Society
New England Journal of Medicine, 351(5), 427-437. MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
The New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 427-37
ISSN: 0028-4793
Popis: Contains fulltext : 58587.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: The value of regular surveillance for breast cancer in women with a genetic or familial predisposition to breast cancer is currently unproven. We compared the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with that of mammography for screening in this group of high-risk women. METHODS: Women who had a cumulative lifetime risk of breast cancer of 15 percent or more were screened every six months with a clinical breast examination and once a year by mammography and MRI, with independent readings. The characteristics of the cancers that were detected were compared with the characteristics of those in two different age-matched control groups. RESULTS: We screened 1909 eligible women, including 358 carriers of germ-line mutations. Within a median follow-up period of 2.9 years, 51 tumors (44 invasive cancers, 6 ductal carcinomas in situ, and 1 lymphoma) and 1 lobular carcinoma in situ were detected. The sensitivity of clinical breast examination, mammography, and MRI for detecting invasive breast cancer was 17.9 percent, 33.3 percent, and 79.5 percent, respectively, and the specificity was 98.1 percent, 95.0 percent, and 89.8 percent, respectively. The overall discriminating capacity of MRI was significantly better than that of mammography (P
Databáze: OpenAIRE