Deep Learning and Random Forest-Based Augmentation of sRNA Expression Profiles

Autor: Jelena Fiosina, Stefan Bonn, Maksims Fiosins
Přispěvatelé: Cai, Zhipeng, Skums, Pavel, Li, Min
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Cham : Springer International Publishing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 11490, 159-170 (2019). doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20242-2_14
Bioinformatics Research and Applications / Cai, Zhipeng (Editor) ; Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2019, Chapter 14 ; ISSN: 0302-9743=1611-3349 ; ISBN: 978-3-030-20241-5=978-3-030-20242-2 ; doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20242-2
Bioinformatics Research and Applications / Cai, Zhipeng (Editor) ; Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2019, Chapter 14 ; ISSN: 0302-9743=1611-3349 ; ISBN: 978-3-030-20241-5=978-3-030-20242-2 ; doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20242-2International Symposium on Bioinformatics Research and Applications
Bioinformatics Research and Applications ISBN: 9783030202415
Popis: The lack of well-structured annotations in a growing amount of RNA expression data complicates data interoperability and reusability. Commonly - used text mining methods extract annotations from existing unstructured data descriptions and often provide inaccurate output that requires manual curation. Automatic data-based augmentation (generation of annotations on the base of expression data) can considerably improve the annotation quality and has not been well-studied. We formulate an automatic augmentation of small RNA-seq expression data as a classification problem and investigate deep learning (DL) and random forest (RF) approaches to solve it. We generate tissue and sex annotations from small RNA-seq expression data for tissues and cell lines of homo sapiens. We validate our approach on 4243 annotated small RNA-seq samples from the Small RNA Expression Atlas (SEA) database. The average prediction accuracy for tissue groups is 98% (DL), for tissues - 96.5% (DL), and for sex - 77% (DL). The "one dataset out" average accuracy for tissue group prediction is 83% (DL) and 59% (RF). On average, DL provides better results as compared to RF, and considerably improves classification performance for 'unseen' datasets.
Databáze: OpenAIRE