Artificial intelligence outperforms pulmonologists in the interpretation of pulmonary function tests

Autor: Topalovic, Marko, Das, Nilakash, Burgel, Pierre-Regis, Daenen, Marc, Derom, Eric, Haenebalcke, Christel, Janssen, Rob, Kerstjens, Huib AM, Liistro, Giuseppe, Louis, Renaud, Ninane, Vincent, Pison, Christophe, Schlesser, Marc, Vercauter, Piet, Vogelmeier, Claus F, Wouters, Emiel, Wynants, Jokke, Janssens, Wim, De Pauw, R, Depuydt, C, Haenebalcke, C, Muyldermans, S, Ringoet, V, Stevens, D, Bayat, S, Benet, J, Catho, E, Claustre, J, Fedi, A, Ferjani, MA, Guzun, R, Isnard, M, Nicolas, S, Pierret, T, Pison, C, Rouches, S, Wuyam, B, Corhay, JL, Guiot, J, Ghysen, K, Renaud, L, Sibille, A, De La Barriere, H, Charpentier, C, Corhut, S, Hamdan, KA, Schlesser, M, Wirtz, G, Alabadan, E, Birsen, G, Burgel, PR, Chohra, A, Hamard, C, Lemarie, B, Lothe, MN, Martin, C, Sainte-Marie, AC, Sebane, L, Berk, Y, de Brouwer, B, Janssen, R, Kerkhoff, J, Spaanderman, A, Stegers, M, Termeer, A, van Grimbergen, I, van Veen, A, van Ruitenbeek, L, Vermeer, L, Zaal, R, Zijlker, M, Aumann, J, Cuppens, K, Degraeve, D, Demuynck, K, Dieriks, B, Pat, K, Spaas, L, Van Puijenbroek, R, Weytjens, K, Wynants, J, Adam, V, Berendes, BJ, Hardeman, E, Jordens, P, Munghen, E, Tournoy, K, Vercauter, P, Alame, T, Bruyneel, M, Gabrovska, M, Muylle, I, Ninane, V, Rozen, D, Rummens, P, Van den Broecke, S, Froidure, A, Gohy, S, Liistro, G, Pieters, T, Pilette, C, Pirson, F, Kerstjens, H, Van den Berge, M, Ten Hacken, N, Duiverman, M, Koster, D, Vosse, B, Conemans, L, Maus, M, Bischoff, M, Rutten, M, Agterhuis, D, Sprooten, R, Beutel, B, Jerrentrup, A, Klemmer, A, Viniol, C, Vogelmeier, C, Bode, H, Dooms, C, Gullentops, D, Janssens, W, Nackaerts, K, Rutens, D, Wauters, E, Wuyts, W, Derom, E, Dobbelaere, S, Loof, S, Serry, G, Putman, B, Van Acker, L, Vandeweygaerde, Y, Criel, M, Daenen, M, Gubbelmans, R, Klerkx, S, Michiels, E, Thomeer, M, Vanhauwaert, A
Přispěvatelé: UCL - (SLuc) Service de pneumologie, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Lifestyle Medicine (LM), Hôpital Cochin [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire [Grenoble] (CHU), Laboratory of Fundamental and Applied Bioenergetics = Laboratoire de bioénergétique fondamentale et appliquée (LBFA), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019]), RS: NUTRIM - R3 - Respiratory & Age-related Health, MUMC+: MA Longziekten (3), Pulmonologie, MUMC+: MA Med Staf Spec Longziekten (9), MUMC+: MA Med Staf Artsass Longziekten (9)
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Adult
Male
Pulmonary function
STRATEGIES
Pulmonary Function Study Investigators
Context (language use)
DIAGNOSIS
GUIDELINES
[SDV.MHEP.PSR]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Pulmonology and respiratory tract
Pulmonary function testing
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Clinical history
Artificial Intelligence
Pulmonary Medicine
Medicine
Humans
030212 general & internal medicine
Prospective Studies
Medical diagnosis
Pulmonologists
Aged
Aged
80 and over

Interpretation (logic)
business.industry
Gold standard (test)
STANDARDIZATION
PERFORMANCE
Middle Aged
3. Good health
Respiratory Function Tests
Clinical Practice
030228 respiratory system
Female
Artificial intelligence
business
[SDV.MHEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology
Software
Zdroj: The European Respiratory Journal, Vol. 11, no.53, p. 4 (2019)
European Respiratory Journal, 53(4):1801660. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Journal, European Respiratory Society, 2019, 53 (4), pp.1801660. ⟨10.1183/13993003.01660-2018⟩
European Respiratory Journal, 53(4):1801660. European Respiratory Society
ISSN: 1399-3003
0903-1936
Popis: The interpretation of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) to diagnose respiratory diseases is built on expert opinion that relies on the recognition of patterns and the clinical context for detection of specific diseases. In this study, we aimed to explore the accuracy and interrater variability of pulmonologists when interpreting PFTs compared with artificial intelligence (AI)-based software that was developed and validated in more than 1500 historical patient cases.120 pulmonologists from 16 European hospitals evaluated 50 cases with PFT and clinical information, resulting in 6000 independent interpretations. The AI software examined the same data. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines were used as the gold standard for PFT pattern interpretation. The gold standard for diagnosis was derived from clinical history, PFT and all additional tests.The pattern recognition of PFTs by pulmonologists (senior 73%, junior 27%) matched the guidelines in 74.4±5.9% of the cases (range 56-88%). The interrater variability of κ=0.67 pointed to a common agreement. Pulmonologists made correct diagnoses in 44.6±8.7% of the cases (range 24-62%) with a large interrater variability (κ=0.35). The AI-based software perfectly matched the PFT pattern interpretations (100%) and assigned a correct diagnosis in 82% of all cases (p
Databáze: OpenAIRE