Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial

Autor: Finnish Shoulder Impingement Arthr, Paavola, Mika, Kanto, Kari, Ranstam, Jonas, Malmivaara, Antti, Inkinen, Jari, Kalske, Juha, Savolainen, Vesa, Sinisaari, Ilkka, Taimela, Simo, Järvinen, Teppo L.
Přispěvatelé: HUS Musculoskeletal and Plastic Surgery, I kirurgian klinikka (Töölö), Helsinki University Hospital Area, FICEBO, University of Helsinki, Department of Surgery
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Male
Time Factors
Acromioplasty
shoulder
acromioplasty
Osteoarthritis
sham
Arthroscopy
0302 clinical medicine
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
315 Sport and fitness sciences
Finland
Original Research
Pain Measurement
030222 orthopedics
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Decompression
Surgical

Exercise Therapy
Intention to Treat Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
Female
randomised
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
VERTEBROPLASTY
impingement
Visual analogue scale
Physical Therapy
Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Placebo
03 medical and health sciences
Double-Blind Method
medicine
Humans
Adverse effect
physiotherapy
Aged
Analysis of Variance
Intention-to-treat analysis
business.industry
medicine.disease
3126 Surgery
anesthesiology
intensive care
radiology

Surgery
Clinical trial
OSTEOARTHRITIS
placebo
business
Follow-Up Studies
Zdroj: British Journal of Sports Medicine
ISSN: 1473-0480
0306-3674
Popis: ObjectivesTo assess the long-term efficacy of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) by comparing it with diagnostic arthroscopy (primary comparison), a placebo surgical intervention, and with a non-operative alternative, exercise therapy (secondary comparison).MethodsWe conducted a multicentre, three group, randomised, controlled superiority trial. We included 210 patients aged 35–65 years, who had symptoms consistent with shoulder impingement syndrome for more than 3 months. 175 participants (83%) completed the 5 years follow-up. Patient enrolment began on 1 February 2005 and the 5-year follow-up was completed by 10 October 2018. The two primary outcomes were shoulder pain at rest and on arm activity measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Minimally important difference (MID) was set at 15. We used a mixed-model repeated measurements analysis of variance with participant as a random factor, the baseline value as a covariate and assuming a covariance structure with compound symmetry.ResultsIn the primary intention to treat analysis (ASD vs diagnostic arthroscopy), there were no between-group differences that exceeded the MID for the primary outcomes at 5 years: the mean difference between groups (ASD minus diagnostic arthroscopy) in pain VAS were −2.0 (95% CI −8.5 to 4.6; p=0.56) at rest and −8.0 (−17.3 to 1.3; p=0.093) on arm activity. There were no between-group differences in the secondary outcomes or adverse events that exceeded the MID. In our secondary comparison (ASD vs exercise therapy), the mean differences between groups (ASD minus exercise therapy) in pain VAS were 1.0 (−5.6 to 7.6; p=0.77) at rest and −3.9 (−12.8 to 5.1; p=0.40) on arm activity. There were no significant between-group differences for the secondary outcomes or adverse events.ConclusionsASD provided no benefit over diagnostic arthroscopy (or exercise therapy) at 5 years for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
Databáze: OpenAIRE