Latina Birth Outcomes in California: Not so Paradoxical

Autor: Michael Curtis, Emma V. Sanchez-Vaznaugh, Paula Braveman, Susan Egerter, Katherine Heck, Kristen S. Marchi
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
Gerontology
Epidemiology
Immigration
Health Behavior
Logistic regression
California
0302 clinical medicine
Pregnancy
Risk Factors
030212 general & internal medicine
health care economics and organizations
media_common
Socioeconomic disadvantage
education.field_of_study
Pregnancy Outcome
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Prenatal Care
Hispanic or Latino
Middle Aged
humanities
Population Surveillance
population characteristics
Premature Birth
Female
medicine.symptom
0305 other medical science
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
media_common.quotation_subject
Population
Emigrants and Immigrants
Infant health
White People
Article
03 medical and health sciences
Young Adult
medicine
Humans
education
Socioeconomic status
Mexico
030505 public health
business.industry
Public health
Public Health
Environmental and Occupational Health

Infant
Newborn

social sciences
Infant
Low Birth Weight

Low birth weight
Logistic Models
Socioeconomic Factors
Pediatrics
Perinatology and Child Health

business
human activities
Demography
Zdroj: Maternal and child health journal. 20(9)
ISSN: 1573-6628
Popis: Objectives To investigate Latina-White differences in birth outcomes in California from 2003 to 2010, looking for evidence of the often-cited "Latina paradox" and assessing the possible role of socioeconomic factors in observed differences. MethodsUsing statewide-representative data from the California Maternal and Infant Health Assessment, an annual population-based postpartum survey, we compared rates of preterm birth (PTB) and low birth weight (LBW) in five groups: U.S.-born non-Latina Whites ("Whites"), U.S.-born Mexican-Americans, U.S.-born non-Mexican Latinas, Mexican immigrants, and non-Mexican Latina immigrants. Logistic regression models examined the relative likelihood of PTB and LBW for women in each Latina subgroup compared with Whites, before and after adjustment for socioeconomic and other covariates. Results In unadjusted analyses, women in each Latina subgroup appeared more likely than White women to have PTB and LBW, although the increased likelihood of LBW among Mexican immigrants was statistically non-significant. After adjustment for less favorable socioeconomic characteristics among Latinas compared with Whites, observed differences in the estimated likelihoods of PTB or LBW for Latina subgroups relative to Whites were attenuated and (with the exception of PTB among U.S.-born Mexican Americans) no longer statistically significant. Conclusions We found no evidence of a "Latina paradox" in birth outcomes, which some have cited as evidence that social disadvantage is not always health-damaging. As observed in several previous studies, our findings were non-paradoxical: consistent with their socioeconomic disadvantage, Latinas had worse birth outcomes than non-Latina White women. Policy-makers should not rely on a "Latina paradox" to ensure good birth outcomes among socioeconomically disadvantaged Latina women.
Databáze: OpenAIRE