Comparing 2% lidocaine gel (Dispogel and Cathejell) in cystoscopy
Autor: | Fatih Oguz, Mustafa Said Aydogan, Muharrem Uçar, Ilhan Gecit |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Dispogel Medicine (General) Adolescent Lidocaine Clinical Research Reports Cost effectiveness 030232 urology & nephrology Pain Blood Pressure Biochemistry Young Adult 03 medical and health sciences R5-920 0302 clinical medicine medicine Humans Elective surgery Pulse cost-effectiveness Aged Pain score pain score medicine.diagnostic_test 2% lidocaine gel business.industry Biochemistry (medical) Cystoscopy Cell Biology General Medicine Middle Aged elective surgery 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Anesthesia business Gels Cathejell medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | The Journal of International Medical Research Journal of International Medical Research, Vol 47 (2019) |
ISSN: | 1473-2300 0300-0605 |
Popis: | Objective Cystoscopy is a common urologic procedure. Analgesics are often used to reduce any pain associated with this procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy in reducing pain and the cost-effectiveness of two forms of lidocaine gel in patients undergoing cystoscopy. Methods In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 77 male patients who were referred for double J removal, urethral dilatation, or cystoscopy were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: Dispogel and Cathejell. All patients received 20 mL of intraurethral lidocaine gel 2% and cystoscopy was performed 5 minutes thereafter. The primary outcome was the pain score (visual analogue scale, VAS) during and 5 minutes after cystoscopy. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the VAS scores, blood pressure, and pulse rate in the groups in either observation period. No patient required additional anesthetic agents or sedatives for insufficient pain relief. Conclusion The results of this study show that the analgesic efficacy of Dispogel and Cathejell in the treatment of pain during and after elective cystoscopy was the same, but Dispogel was more cost-effective. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |