Development of a Draft Core Set of Domains for Measuring Shared Decision Making in Osteoarthritis: An OMERACT Working Group on Shared Decision Making
| Autor: | Karine Toupin-April, Jennifer Barton, Liana Fraenkel, Linda Li, Viviane Grandpierre, Francis Guillemin, Tamara Rader, Dawn Stacey, France Légaré, Janet Jull, Jennifer Petkovic, Marieke Scholte-Voshaar, Vivian Welch, Anne Lyddiatt, Cathie Hofstetter, Maarten De Wit, Lyn March, Tanya Meade, Robin Christensen, Cécile Gaujoux-Viala, Maria E. Suarez-Almazor, Annelies Boonen, Christoph Pohl, Richard Martin, Peter S. Tugwell |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Ethics, Law & Medical humanities, EMGO - Quality of care, Interne Geneeskunde, RS: CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, RS: CAPHRI - R3 - Functioning, Participating and Rehabilitation, Service de Rhumatologie [CHRU Nancy], Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes), Aide à la Décision pour une Médecine Personnalisé - Laboratoire de Biostatistique, Epidémiologie et Recherche Clinique - EA 2415 (AIDMP), Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université de Montpellier (UM) |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Process (engineering) Consensus Development Conferences as Topic Immunology Applied psychology OUTCOME ASSESSMENT Decision Making Outcome (game theory) Risk Assessment Session (web analytics) Article Core domain 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Rheumatology Nominal group technique Osteoarthritis Outcome Assessment Health Care IMPLEMENTATION Immunology and Allergy Medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Set (psychology) Aged 030203 arthritis & rheumatology Core set OUTCOMES business.industry Australia OMERACT Middle Aged Europe Core (game theory) [SDV.MHEP.RSOA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Rhumatology and musculoskeletal system North America Practice Guidelines as Topic SHARED DECISION MAKING Female business |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Rheumatology, 42(12), 2442-2447. Journal of Rheumatology Journal of Rheumatology, 42(12), 2442-2447. Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Co. Ltd. Toupin-April, K, Barton, J, Fraenkel, L, Li, L, Grandpierre, V, Guillemin, F, Rader, T, Stacey, D, Legare, F, Jull, J, Petkovic, J, Scholte-Voshaar, M, Welch, V, Lyddiatt, A, Hofstetter, C, de Wit, M P T, March, L, Meade, T, Christensen, R, Gaujoux-Viala, C, Suarez-Almazor, M E, Boonen, A, Pohl, C, Martin, R & Tugwell, P S 2015, ' Development of a Draft Core Set of Domains for Measuring Shared Decision Making in Osteoarthritis: An OMERACT Working Group on Shared Decision Making ', Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 2442-2447 . https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.141205 Journal of Rheumatology Journal of Rheumatology, Journal of Rheumatology Publishing Company Limited, 2015, 42 (12), pp.2442-2447. ⟨10.3899/jrheum.141205⟩ |
| ISSN: | 1499-2752 0315-162X |
| DOI: | 10.3899/jrheum.141205 |
| Popis: | Objective.Despite the importance of shared decision making for delivering patient-centered care in rheumatology, there is no consensus on how to measure its process and outcomes. The aim of this Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) working group is to determine the core set of domains for measuring shared decision making in intervention studies in adults with osteoarthritis (OA), from the perspectives of patients, health professionals, and researchers.Methods.We followed the OMERACT Filter 2.0 method to develop a draft core domain set by (1) forming an OMERACT working group; (2) conducting a review of domains of shared decision making; and (3) obtaining opinions of all those involved using a modified nominal group process held at a session activity at the OMERACT 12 meeting.Results.In all, 26 people from Europe, North America, and Australia, including 5 patient research partners, participated in the session activity. Participants identified the following domains for measuring shared decision making to be included as part of the draft core set: (1) identifying the decision, (2) exchanging information, (3) clarifying views, (4) deliberating, (5) making the decision, (6) putting the decision into practice, and (7) assessing the effect of the decision. Contextual factors were also suggested.Conclusion.We proposed a draft core set of shared decision-making domains for OA intervention research studies. Next steps include a workshop at OMERACT 13 to reach consensus on these proposed domains in the wider OMERACT group, as well as to detail subdomains and assess instruments to develop a core outcome measurement set. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|