The state of the science of interprofessional collaborative practice: A scoping review of the patient health-related outcomes based literature published between 2010 and 2018
| Autor: | May Nawal Lutfiyya, Linda Feng Chang, Martin S. Lipsky, Cynthia A McGrath, Clark Dana |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
Medical Doctors Health Care Providers Collaborative Care Blood Pressure Pharmacists Vascular Medicine Endocrinology 0302 clinical medicine Outcome Assessment Health Care Health care Medicine and Health Sciences Medical Personnel 030212 general & internal medicine Cooperative Behavior Intersectoral Collaboration Allied Health Care Professionals Multidisciplinary 030504 nursing Publications Professions Treatment Outcome Systematic review Evidence-Based Practice Medicine 0305 other medical science Psychology Research Article Evidence-based practice Endocrine Disorders Interprofessional Relations Science Population health 03 medical and health sciences Patient satisfaction Nursing Physicians Diabetes Mellitus Humans Research question Primary Care business.industry Interprofessional education United States Health Care Metabolic Disorders People and Places Population Groupings business |
| Zdroj: | PLoS ONE, Vol 14, Iss 6, p e0218578 (2019) PLoS ONE |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
| Popis: | IntroductionIf interprofessional collaborative practice is to be an important component of healthcare reform, then an evidentiary base connecting interprofessional education to interprofessional practice with significantly improved health and healthcare outcomes is an unconditional necessity. This study is a scoping review of the current peer reviewed literature linking interprofessional collaborative care and interprofessional collaborative practice to clearly identified healthcare and/or patient health-related outcomes. The research question for this review was: What does the evidence from the past decade reveal about the impact of Interprofessional collaborative practice on patient-related outcomes in the US healthcare system?Materials and methodsA modified preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) approach was followed.ResultsOf an initial 375 articles retrieved 20 met review criteria. The most common professions represented in the studies reviewed were physicians, pharmacists and nurses. Primary care was the most common care delivery setting and measures related to chronic disease the most commonly measured outcomes. No study identified negative impacts of interprofessional collaborative practice. Eight outcome categories emerged from a content analysis of the findings of the reviewed studies.ConclusionsThe results suggest a need for more research on the measurable impact of interprofessional collaborative practice and/or care on patient health-related outcomes to further document its benefits and to explore the models, systems and nature of collaborations that best improve population health, increase patient satisfaction, and reduce cost of care. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|