Appropriate Use of Bifactor Analysis in Psychopathology Research: Appreciating Benefits and Limitations
Autor: | Karl J. Petersen, Brenton M. Wiernik, Marina A. Bornovalova, Alexandria M. Choate, Haya Fatimah |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Research design Construct validity Statistical model Appropriate use Global model 03 medical and health sciences 030104 developmental biology 0302 clinical medicine Criterion validity Research questions Psychology 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Biological Psychiatry Psychopathology Cognitive psychology |
Zdroj: | Biological Psychiatry. 88:18-27 |
ISSN: | 0006-3223 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.01.013 |
Popis: | Co-occurrence of psychiatric disorders is well-documented. Recent quantitative efforts have moved toward an understanding of this phenomenon, with the ‘general psychopathology’ or p-factor model emerging as the most prominent characterization. Over the past decade, bifactor model analysis has become increasingly popular as a statistical approach to describe common/shared and unique elements in psychopathology. However, recent work has highlighted potential problems with common approaches to evaluating and interpreting bifactor models. Here, we argue that, when properly applied and interpreted, bifactor models can be useful for answering some important questions in psychology and psychiatry research. We review problems with evaluating bifactor models based on global model fit statistics. We then describe more valid approaches to evaluating bifactor models and highlight three types of research questions for which bifactor models are well-suited to answer. We also discuss the utility and limits of bifactor applications in genetic and neurobiological research. We close by comparing advantages and disadvantages of bifactor models to other analytic approaches and noting that no statistical model is a panacea to rectify limitations of the research design used to gather data. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |