Applying a New CT Quality Metric in Radiology: How CT Pulmonary Angiography Repeat Rates Compare Across Institutions
| Autor: | Jeffery P. Kanne, Timothy P. Szczykutowicz, Sean D. Rose, Ben Viggiano, Carrie Bartels, Robert K. Bour |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Ct pulmonary angiography
medicine.medical_specialty business.industry Angiography Retrospective cohort study Odds ratio Logistic regression 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging Rate analysis 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Humans Medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Metric (unit) Radiology Pulmonary Embolism Tomography X-Ray Computed business Retrospective Studies |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the American College of Radiology. 18:962-968 |
| ISSN: | 1546-1440 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.02.014 |
| Popis: | To quantify overall CT repeat and reject rates at five institutions and investigate repeat and reject rates for CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).In this retrospective study, we apply an automated repeat rate analysis algorithm to 103,752 patient examinations performed at five institutions from July 2017 to August 2019. The algorithm identifies repeated scans for specific scanner and protocol combinations. For each institution, we compared repeat rates for CTPA to all other CT protocols. We used logistic regression and analysis of deviance to compare CTPA repeat rates across institutions and size-based protocols.Of 103,752 examinations, 1,447 contained repeated helical scans (1.4%). Overall repeat rates differed across institutions (P .001) ranging from 0.8% to 1.8%. Large-patient CTPA repeat rates ranged from 3.0% to 11.2% with the odds (95% confidence intervals) of a repeat being 4.8 (3.5-6.6) times higher for large- relative to medium-patient CTPA protocols. CTPA repeat rates were elevated relative to all other CT protocols at four of five institutions, with strong evidence of an effect at two institutions (P.001 for each; odds ratios: 2.0 [1.6-2.6] and 6.2 [4.4-8.9]) and somewhat weaker evidence at the others (P = .005 and P = 0.011; odds ratios: 2.2 [1.3-3.8] and 3.7 [1.5-9.1], respectively). Accounting for size-based protocols, CTPA repeat rates differed across institutions (P .001).The results indicate low overall repeat rates (2%) with CTPA rates elevated relative to other protocols. Large-patient CTPA rates were highest (eg, 11.2% at one institution). Differences in repeat rates across institutions suggest the potential for quality improvement. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|