Evidence Base on Outpatient Behavioral Treatments for Adolescent Substance Use, 2014–2017: Outcomes, Treatment Delivery, and Promising Horizons
| Autor: | Aaron Hogue, Sara J. Becker, Craig E. Henderson, Danica K. Knight |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Psychotherapist
Adolescent Substance-Related Disorders media_common.quotation_subject Motivational interviewing MEDLINE 030508 substance abuse Contingency management Fidelity History 21st Century Article 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Adolescent substance Behavior Therapy Developmental and Educational Psychology Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Child media_common Moderation Outcomes treatment Clinical Psychology Treatment Outcome Meta-analysis 0305 other medical science Psychology |
| Zdroj: | J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol |
| Popis: | This article updates the evidence base on outpatient behavioral treatments for adolescent substance use (ASU) since publication of the previous review completed for this journal by Hogue, Henderson, Ozechowski, and Robbins (2014). It first summarizes the Hogue et al. findings along with those from recent literature reviews and meta-analytic studies of ASU treatments. It then presents study design and methods criteria used to select 11 comparative studies subjected to Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology level of support evaluation. These 11 studies are detailed in terms of their sample characteristics, methodological quality, and substance use outcomes. Cumulative level of support designations are then made for each identified treatment approach. These cumulative designations are virtually identical to those of the previous review: ecological family-based treatment, individual cognitive-behavioral therapy, and group cognitive-behavioral therapy remain well-established; behavioral family-based treatment and motivational interviewing remain probably efficacious; drug counseling remains possibly efficacious; and an updated total of 5 multicomponent treatments combining more than 1 approach (3 of which include contingency management) are deemed well-established or probably efficacious. Treatment delivery issues associated with evidence-based approaches are then reviewed, focusing on client engagement, fidelity and mediator, and predictor and moderator effects. Finally, to help accelerate innovation in ASU treatment science and practice, the article outlines promising horizons in improving youth identification and access, specifying and implementing pragmatic treatment in community settings, and leveraging emerging lessons from implementation science. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|