In vitro anti-leishmanial activity of Prunus armeniaca fractions on Leishmania tropica and molecular docking studies
Autor: | Aneeqa Hamid, Naveeda Akhter Qureshi, Nargis Shaheen, Attiya Iqbal, Asma Ashraf, Huma Fatima |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Male
Antioxidant Leishmania tropica Prunus armeniaca medicine.medical_treatment Carboxylic acid 030303 biophysics Biophysics Ethyl acetate Antiprotozoal Agents Carboxylic Acids Drug Evaluation Preclinical 02 engineering and technology Aldehyde Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry 03 medical and health sciences chemistry.chemical_compound Nitric acid Alkanes medicine Benzene Derivatives Animals Humans Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Carbazic acid Sulfhydryl Compounds chemistry.chemical_classification 0303 health sciences Aldehydes Mice Inbred BALB C Radiation Radiological and Ultrasound Technology biology Plant Extracts 021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology biology.organism_classification Thin-layer chromatography Molecular Docking Simulation Plant Leaves Hydrazines chemistry Alkynes 0210 nano-technology Cyclobutanes Nuclear chemistry |
Zdroj: | Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology. 213 |
ISSN: | 1873-2682 |
Popis: | Prunus armeniaca (L.) is a member of the Rosaceae, subfamily Prunoideae, shows anticancer, antitubercular, antimutagenic, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and cardioprotective activities. Here we fractionated the leaves extract of this highly medicinally important plant for antileishmanial activity. In the current study, the leaves extract was fractionated and characterized using column and thin layer chromatography by n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol solvents. Twelve fractions were isolated and subjected for evaluation of their cytotoxicity and in vitro antileishmanial activity against promastigotes and amastigotes of Leishmania tropica. Among all fractions used, the fraction (F7) exhibited the strongest antileishmanial activity. The bioactive fraction was further characterized by spectroscopy (FTIR, UV–Vis), and GC-MS analysis. The in silico docking was carried out to find the active site of PTR1. All derived fractions exhibited toxicity in the safety range IC50 > 100 μg/ml. The fraction (F7) showed significantly the highest antipromastigotes activity with IC5011.48 ± 0.82 μg/ml and antiamastigotes activity with IC50 21.03 ± 0.98 μg/ml compared with control i.e. 11.60 ± 0.70 and 22.03 ± 1.02 μg/ml respectively. The UV–Vis spectroscopic analysis revealed the presence of six absorption peaks and the FTIR spectrum revealed the presence of alkane, aldehyde, carboxylic acid, thiols, alkynes, and carbonyls compounds The GC–MS chromatogram exhibited the presence of nine compounds: (a) benzeneethanol, alpha, beta dimethyl, (b)carbazic acid, 3-(1 propylbutylidene)-, ethyl ester, (c)1, 2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, diisooctyl ester, (d)benzeneethanamine a-methyl, (e)2aminononadecane, (f)2-heptanamine-5-methyl, (g)cyclobutanol, (h)cyclopropyl carbine, and (i)nitric acid, nonyl ester. Among all compounds, the 1, 2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, diisooctyl ester bound well to the PTR1 receptor. Fraction (F7) showed acceptable results with no cytotoxicity. However, in vivo studies are required in the future. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |