Validity of injury self-reports by novice runners

Autor: Bas Kluitenberg, Bionka M. A. Huisstede, Frank J G Backx, Evert Verhagen, Marienke van Middelkoop, Henk van der Worp, Dirk-Wouter Smits, Fred Hartgens
Přispěvatelé: Epidemiologie, MUMC+: MA Heelkunde (9), RS: CAPHRI - R3 - Functioning, Participating and Rehabilitation, APH - Health Behaviors & Chronic Diseases, Public and occupational health, Amsterdam Movement Sciences - Sports and Work, General Practice
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Male
validity
Sports medicine
Physical Therapy
0302 clinical medicine
Medicine
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
biology
self-reports
Middle Aged
medicine.anatomical_structure
Predictive value of tests
Athletic Injuries
Musculoskeletal injury
Ligament
Female
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Athletic Injuries/diagnosis
Physical Therapy
Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
NLSTART2RUN
Sensitivity and Specificity
injury location
03 medical and health sciences
injury type
Predictive Value of Tests
Physicians
Journal Article
Criterion validity
running
Humans
Comparative Study
Validation Studies
Groin
business.industry
Athletes
RUNNING-RELATED INJURIES
030229 sport sciences
medicine.disease
biology.organism_classification
RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS
Running/injuries
MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURY
Physical therapy
RISK-FACTORS
Self Report
Ankle
business
FOLLOW-UP
human activities
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
LOWER-EXTREMITY INJURIES
Zdroj: Research in Sports Medicine, 27(1), 72-87. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group
Research in Sports Medicine, 27(1), 72-87. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Research in Sports Medicine, 27(1), 72. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Research in Sports Medicine, 27(1), 72-87. Taylor & Francis Group
Research in Sports Medicine, 27(1), 72-87. Taylor & Francis Ltd
Smits, D W, Backx, F, Van Der Worp, H, Van Middelkoop, M, Hartgens, F, Verhagen, E, Kluitenberg, B & Huisstede, B 2019, ' Validity of injury self-reports by novice runners : comparison with reports by sports medicine physicians ', Research in Sports Medicine, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 72-87 . https://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2018.1492399
ISSN: 1543-8627
DOI: 10.1080/15438627.2018.1492399
Popis: This study examined the criterion validity of self-reported running-related injuries (RRI) by novice runners. Fifty-eight participants (41 females; age 46 ± 11 yrs) of the "Start-to-Run" program provided self-reports on their RRIs using an online questionnaire. Subsequently, they attended injury consultations with sports medicine physicians who provided physician-reports (blinded for the self-reports) as a reference standard. Self-reports and physician-reports included information on injury location (i.e., hip/groin, upper leg, knee, lower leg, and ankle/foot) and injury type (i.e., muscle-tendon unit, joint, ligament, or bone). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values were 100% for all five injury locations. For injury type, sensitivity was low (66% for muscle-tendon unit, 50% for ligament, and 40% for bone) and lowest for joint injuries (17%). In conclusion, the validity of self-reported RRIs by novice runners is good for injury locations but not for injury types. In particular for joint injuries, the validity of novice runners' self-reports is low.ABBREVIATIONS: RRI: Running Related Injury; SMC: Sports Medicine Centre; MTU: Muscle Tendon Unit; PPV: Positive Predictive Value.
Databáze: OpenAIRE