Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Reconstructed Knee

Autor: David Lloyd, Christopher J. Vertullo, Julian A. Feller, Pauline Gerus, Kim L Bennell, Tim V. Wrigley, Jason M. Konrath, Bryce A. Killen, Flavia M. Cicuttini, Karine Fortin, Luca Modenese, Price Gallie, David J. Saxby, Adam L. Bryant, Tim Whitehead
Přispěvatelé: INSIGNEO Institute for in Silico Medicine, University of Sheffield [Sheffield], Laboratoire Motricité Humaine Expertise Sport Santé (LAMHESS), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (... - 2019) (UNS), COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-Université de Toulon (UTLN)-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA)
Rok vydání: 2016
Předmět:
Adult
Male
musculoskeletal diseases
Knee Joint
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Anterior cruciate ligament
medicine.medical_treatment
Physical Therapy
Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Walking
Kinematics
Electromyography
Transplantation
Autologous

Running
Contact force
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Gait (human)
medicine
Humans
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Muscle
Skeletal

Gait
ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS
Mathematics
Orthodontics
030222 orthopedics
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
medicine.diagnostic_test
[SPI.MECA.BIOM]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Biomechanics [physics.med-ph]
030229 sport sciences
Anatomy
musculoskeletal system
Biomechanical Phenomena
3. Good health
Transplantation
medicine.anatomical_structure
Time and Motion Studies
Female
Zdroj: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), 2016, 48 (11), pp.2195-2206. ⟨10.1249/MSS.0000000000001021⟩
ISSN: 0195-9131
1530-0315
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000001021
Popis: AB Purpose: To investigate differences in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed (ACLR) and healthy individuals in terms of the magnitude of the tibiofemoral contact forces, as well as the relative muscle and external load contributions to those contact forces, during walking, running, and sidestepping gait tasks. Methods: A computational EMG-driven neuromusculoskeletal model was used to estimate the muscle and tibiofemoral contact forces in those with single-bundle combined semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autograft ACLR (n = 104, 29.7 +/- 6.5 yr, 78.1 +/- 14.4 kg) and healthy controls (n = 60, 27.5 +/- 5.4 yr, 67.8 +/- 14.0 kg) during walking (1.4 +/- 0.2 m[middle dot]s-1), running (4.5 +/- 0.5 m[middle dot]s-1) and sidestepping (3.7 +/- 0.6 m[middle dot]s-1). Within the computational model, the semitendinosus of ACLR participants was adjusted to account for literature reported strength deficits and morphological changes subsequent to autograft harvesting. Results: ACLR had smaller maximum total and medial tibiofemoral contact forces (~80% of control values, scaled to bodyweight) during the different gait tasks. Compared with controls, ACLR were found to have a smaller maximum knee flexion moment, which explained the smaller tibiofemoral contact forces. Similarly, compared with controls, ACLR had both a smaller maximum knee flexion angle and knee flexion excursion during running and sidestepping, which may have concentrated the articular contact forces to smaller areas within the tibiofemoral joint. Mean relative muscle and external load contributions to the tibiofemoral contact forces were not significantly different between ACLR and controls. Conclusions: ACLR had lower bodyweight-scaled tibiofemoral contact forces during walking, running, and sidestepping, likely due to lower knee flexion moments and straighter knee during the different gait tasks. The relative contributions of muscles and external loads to the contact forces were equivalent between groups. (C) 2016 American College of Sports Medicine
Databáze: OpenAIRE