Evaluations of public health interventions produced by health technology assessment agencies: A mapping review and analysis by type and evidence content
Autor: | Kalipso Chalkidou, Pascale Renée Cyr, Unni Gopinathan, Vageesh Jain, Trygve Ottersen |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
education.field_of_study Priority setting Technology Assessment Biomedical 030503 health policy & services Health Policy Public health Public health interventions Population Psychological intervention Health technology Checklist 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Family medicine medicine Humans 030212 general & internal medicine Public Health 0305 other medical science Psychology education Public health policy |
Zdroj: | Health Policy |
ISSN: | 0168-8510 |
Popis: | Objectives: Health technology assessments (HTAs) have been suggested as a strategy to bridge the evidence-to-policy gap in public health. It is unclear to what extent HTAs have been prepared to assist decisions to implement public health interventions (PHIs). We aimed to describe the experience of HTA agencies by mapping, classifying, and analyzing the evidence content of HTAs of PHIs. Methods: We systematically searched databases of 35 HTA agencies from 18 countries for evaluations of PHIs between 2008-2018. Interventions were classified using the International Classification of Health Interventions and the evidence content analysed with the INAHTA Product-Type-mark checklist. Results: Only 1010 (9%) of HTAs were on PHIs. 500 (50%) publications targeted Body Systems and Functions, 302 (30%) Health-related Behaviours, 137 (14%) the Environment and 44 (4%) Activities and Participation Domains. Out of 734 publications perused, few met the criteria of full-HTAs (71;10%) or mini-HTAs (110;15%). Most were rapid reviews (420;57%). 72% of all reports came from only 6 countries. Conclusion: HTAs on PHIs were uncommon relative to clinical interventions. HTAs on population-based PHIs were less comprehensive in quality and rigor of the evidence. Countries with more resources and mature HTA-systems had done the most evaluations. Exploring the experiences of forerunners could help overcome barriers to evaluations of PHIs and exploit the full potential of HTAs to promote evidence-based public health. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |