Scientific output quality of 40 globally top-ranked medical researchers in the field of osteoporosis
Autor: | Piotr Adamczyk, K. Noga, Bogna Drozdzowska, Wojciech Pluskiewicz |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
Biomedical Research Index (economics) media_common.quotation_subject Citation index Citations Scopus Bibliometrics Field (computer science) 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Statistics Humans Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Quality (business) media_common Publishing business.industry Research Personnel 030104 developmental biology Science quality index Ranking 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Individual output Osteoporosis Original Article H-index Citation business |
Zdroj: | Archives of Osteoporosis |
ISSN: | 1862-3514 1862-3522 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11657-018-0446-4 |
Popis: | Summary The study presents the research output of 40 globally top-ranked authors, publishing in the field of osteoporosis. Their h-index is compared with the Scientific Quality Index (SQI), a novel indicator. Using SQI, 92.5% of the authors changed their initial positions in the general ranking. SQI partially depends on bibliometric measures different from those influencing h-index and may be considered as an assessment tool, reflecting more objective, qualitative, rather than quantitative, features of individual scientific output. Purpose The study approaches the research output of 40 globally top-ranked authors in the field of osteoporosis. Methods The assessed authors were identified in the Scopus database, using the key word “osteoporosis” and the h-index data, collected during the last decade (2008–2017). The data, concerning the scientific output, expressed by the h-index, were compared with a novel indicator of scientific quality—called the Scientific Quality Index (SQI). SQI is calculated according to the following formula: Parameter No. 1 + Parameter No. 2, where: Parameter No. 1 (the percent of papers cited ≥ 10 times) the number of papers cited ≥ 10 times (excluding self-citations and citations of all co-authors) is divided by the number of all the published papers (including the papers with no citation) × 100%, Parameter No. 2 (the mean number of citations per paper) the total number of citations (excluding self-citations and citations of all co-authors) divided by the number of all published papers (including papers with no citation). Results The following research output values were obtained: the citation index, 2483.6 ± 1348.7; the total number of papers, 75.1 ± 23.2; the total number of cited papers, 69.3 ± 22.0; the number of papers cited, at least, 10 times, 45.4 ± 17.2; the percent of papers cited, at least, 10 times, 59.9 ± 10.0; and the mean citations per paper, 32.8 ± 15.0. The mean value of Hirsch index was 24.2 ± 6.2 and SQI 92.7 ± 22.3. Using SQI, only three authors did not change their initial ranking position, established according to the h-index; 18 authors noted a decrease, while other 19 improved their initial ranking position. The h-index correlated with SQI; r = 0.72; p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |