Variability in repeated economic games: comparing trust game decisions to other social trust measures
| Autor: | Lettinga, Niels, Safra, Lou, Jacquet, Pierre, Chevallier, Coralie |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | HAL UVSQ, Équipe, Frontières en cognition - - FrontCog2017 - ANR-17-EURE-0017 - EURE - VALID, La psychologie de la pauvreté : biais de négativité et préférence temporelles. - - PovertyCognition2021 - ANR-21-CE28-0009 - AAPG2021 - VALID, Département d'Etudes Cognitives - ENS Paris (DEC), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Centre de recherches politiques de Sciences Po (Sciences Po, CNRS) (CEVIPOF), Sciences Po (Sciences Po)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Paul Brousse-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris-Saclay, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles André Mignot (CHV), This study was supported by the EUR FrontCog grant no. ANR-17-EURE-0017 and the grant ANR-21-CE28-0009., ANR-17-EURE-0017,FrontCog,Frontières en cognition(2017), ANR-21-CE28-0009,PovertyCognition,La psychologie de la pauvreté : biais de négativité et préférence temporelles.(2021) |
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: |
Behavioral Economics
Social Work Multidisciplinary Social Psychology Economics variability [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ComputingMilieux_PERSONALCOMPUTING Cognitive Psychology social trust Social and Behavioral Sciences Repeated economic games self-reported questionnaires external validity Trust game FOS: Sociology FOS: Psychology [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio] trust game Personality and Social Contexts repeated economic games Psychology |
| Zdroj: | Royal Society Open Science Royal Society Open Science, 2022, 9 (9), pp.210213. ⟨10.1098/rsos.210213⟩ |
| ISSN: | 2054-5703 |
| DOI: | 10.1098/rsos.210213 |
| Popis: | International audience; Economic games are well-established tools that offer a convenient approach to study social behaviour. Although widely used, recent evidence suggests that decisions made in the context of standard economic games are less predictive of real-world behaviour than previously assumed self-reported questionnaires. A possible explanation for this discrepancy is that economic games decisions in the laboratory are more likely to be influenced by the current situation, while questionnaires are specifically designed to measure people's average behaviour across a long period of time. To test this hypothesis, we performed a longitudinal study where 275 respondents played 16 Trust games every two days within a three-week period, and filled out a questionnaire that measures social trust. This study confirmed the instability of our measure of trust behaviour over time and the substantial stability of questionnaire responses. However, we found a significant association between self-reported social trust and participants' average behaviour in the trust game measured across sessions, but also with participants' behaviour measured only in Session 1. Nevertheless, analysis of behavioural changes in the Trust games over time revealed different behavioural profiles, highlighting how economic games and questionnaires can complement each other in the study of social trust. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|