The comparative analysis of results of retropubic and miniinvasive radical prostatectomy

Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Здоровье мужчины, Vol 0, Iss 2(61), Pp 29-36 (2017)
ISSN: 2412-5547
2307-5090
Popis: The objective: is to conduct a comparative analysis of complications of retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) in patients with prostate cancer by determining the frequency and severity of postoperative complications. Patients and methods. There were analyzed the medical history of 453 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) in conditions of SI «Institute of Urology of NAMS Ukraine» in 2013–2015 years and SI «V.K. Gusak’s Institute of Emergency and Recovery Surgery of NAMS Ukraine» during the 2006–2013 years. All patients were divided into two groups. Group I were consisted of 210 (46.4%) patients who underwent MIRP, and group II were included 243 (53.6%) patients after RRP. Complications were divided: by the number; by severity according to the scale P.A. Clavien et al. (2009); by type for G. Novara et al. (2010); by prognostic group formed by P.M. Pierorazio et al. (2013). Results. The group, which were performed MIRP, were dominated genitourinary complications in case of 64,8±3,3% to 50,2±3,2% in the group, which were performed RRP (ч2=9,736, df=1; p2 =0,004, df=1; p>0,05); and the number of infectious complications was higher in the group, which were performed RRP, and amounted 8,6±1,8 % than in the group, which were performed MIRP, with amount 3,3±1,2% (Χ 2 =5,474, df=1; p2 =1,152, df=1; p>0,05). Percentage absence of prostate cancer, according to the final postoperative histological study group, which were performed MIRP, composed 2,9±1,1%, while the group, which were performed RRP, 3,3±1,1%. Group I was illustrated statistically significantly more patients of II prognostic group: 30,5±3,2% to 22,2±2,7% (Χ 2 =3,984, df=1; p2 =8,176, df=1; p
Databáze: OpenAIRE