Comparative Study of an Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration for Liver Tumors
| Autor: | Masatsugu Nagahama, Jun Noda, Tomoko Norose, Takahiro Kobayashi, Nobuyuki Ohike, Yuichi Takano, Kenichi Matsuo, Fumitaka Niiya, Kuniya Tanaka, Naotaka Maruoka, Tetsushi Azami, Masataka Yamawaki, Tetsuji Wakabayashi |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Endoscopic ultrasound
Image-Guided Biopsy medicine.medical_specialty liver tumor Percutaneous Liver tumor 030204 cardiovascular system & hematology percutaneous biopsy Lesion 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Biopsy Internal Medicine medicine Humans Adverse effect Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Retrospective Studies medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Liver Neoplasms Retrospective cohort study General Medicine medicine.disease digestive system diseases Fine-needle aspiration EUS-FNA 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Original Article Radiology medicine.symptom business |
| Zdroj: | Internal Medicine |
| ISSN: | 1349-7235 |
| Popis: | Objective Both a percutaneous biopsy and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) have been widely performed for liver tumors. However, no studies have compared these two biopsy methods. Method A retrospective study was conducted using medical records for patients who underwent a liver tumor biopsy from 2012 to 2019. The cases were classified into two groups for a comparison: an ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy group (percutaneous group) and an EUS-FNA group (EUS group). Results A total of 106 patients (47 in the percutaneous group and 59 in the EUS group) were included. The final diagnosis was malignant in 100 cases and benign in the remaining 6 cases. While the median lesion diameter was 62 mm in the percutaneous group, it was significantly smaller (34 mm) in the EUS group (p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|